Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp25126yba; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:48:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqww/MqVOYcFnjFfrtmlU22ezVwFVi2ytu+Br1LOOgb+9+j3P8BHWi2HJjINAnGzOmi3EYHM X-Received: by 2002:a63:f218:: with SMTP id v24mr52359274pgh.326.1554288491846; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 03:48:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554288491; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1EM3aFqad56XpfyrloiYE/BvZuXqoqJEHM0ByNMlpKmNPXBUYjMf6IfOqUFmfvV3LQ 8D7xGB3IoWuRlDgIPlWS6HFU9GWe4UmSxsJtPghR2hDmqeWIjLqkNRImDwIyugq8t7L0 heAhB4+7F07v6qJfxKmSRU14vU7Z6x+GS/7s4YKcI289SWYxtkxs9JoxnMtcYhNUhlgl qeR8QDPn6MjOVKXmqsYMVEmMoezXBReulifsvVu0GMedEmwfxxxUjgoa0HImqZZlViwB AI1SOI5LvqyKRtKwXVcr9/4Z3BaQiw9/q8n8v4GLgH4g+lCjxzAjEiz+P9uYaar3oBix bvpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:robot-unsubscribe:robot-id :git-commit-id:subject:to:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc :message-id:from:date; bh=zcKJkVUUJxRU1bF/GmPMyO4BoytUjWE+Sn/WWvEeQkQ=; b=n1Hot7hoGRccmyQZjG/5pTe45JoubK5WmlVNejIRn5V6wsMZN7XRko/fHh5ZC6DrPT 370ZP67BNDL5akjoNYpsDZmos3jD2vkhVZH8gJ2BGCr6CV9w58lTfXRiyEfWbnJ2Gqvo NPTrIR0bYr2qaq2q0Fpg3tYWjLEr9FdTkQz57tLEEVD89a22imQu8nPv8uFHhNI4W3Iw RvwrxW9BkzHLiwA4pSiNBQcqZeEmrzS+wY45evpzJTuUkD7C2svaaNJzVE9spyLWn1M8 EhXnTEVfROXR/vnux/96w1/5Mah7JeL81OuIs7VDWTH8Ro6EbnoHyTb4nn4YcB/rIryF MPHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t21si13142448plr.366.2019.04.03.03.47.56; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 03:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726826AbfDCKrF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 06:47:05 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.136]:32935 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726167AbfDCKrE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 06:47:04 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by terminus.zytor.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x33AjYoN1814969 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:45:34 -0700 Received: (from tipbot@localhost) by terminus.zytor.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x33AjYF31814966; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:45:34 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:45:34 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: terminus.zytor.com: tipbot set sender to tipbot@zytor.com using -f From: tip-bot for Waiman Long Message-ID: Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, tglx@linutronix.de, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, longman@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, bp@alien8.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Reply-To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, longman@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, tglx@linutronix.de, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20190322143008.21313-4-longman@redhat.com> References: <20190322143008.21313-4-longman@redhat.com> To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock() Git-Commit-ID: 0975e3df30eb5849284c01be66c2ec16d8a48114 X-Mailer: tip-git-log-daemon Robot-ID: Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact to get blacklisted from these emails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit-ID: 0975e3df30eb5849284c01be66c2ec16d8a48114 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0975e3df30eb5849284c01be66c2ec16d8a48114 Author: Waiman Long AuthorDate: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:30:08 -0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:42:35 +0200 locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock() Modify __down_read_trylock() to optimize for an unlocked rwsem and make it generate slightly better code. Before this patch, down_read_trylock: 0x0000000000000000 <+0>: callq 0x5 0x0000000000000005 <+5>: jmp 0x18 0x0000000000000007 <+7>: lea 0x1(%rdx),%rcx 0x000000000000000b <+11>: mov %rdx,%rax 0x000000000000000e <+14>: lock cmpxchg %rcx,(%rdi) 0x0000000000000013 <+19>: cmp %rax,%rdx 0x0000000000000016 <+22>: je 0x23 0x0000000000000018 <+24>: mov (%rdi),%rdx 0x000000000000001b <+27>: test %rdx,%rdx 0x000000000000001e <+30>: jns 0x7 0x0000000000000020 <+32>: xor %eax,%eax 0x0000000000000022 <+34>: retq 0x0000000000000023 <+35>: mov %gs:0x0,%rax 0x000000000000002c <+44>: or $0x3,%rax 0x0000000000000030 <+48>: mov %rax,0x20(%rdi) 0x0000000000000034 <+52>: mov $0x1,%eax 0x0000000000000039 <+57>: retq After patch, down_read_trylock: 0x0000000000000000 <+0>: callq 0x5 0x0000000000000005 <+5>: xor %eax,%eax 0x0000000000000007 <+7>: lea 0x1(%rax),%rdx 0x000000000000000b <+11>: lock cmpxchg %rdx,(%rdi) 0x0000000000000010 <+16>: jne 0x29 0x0000000000000012 <+18>: mov %gs:0x0,%rax 0x000000000000001b <+27>: or $0x3,%rax 0x000000000000001f <+31>: mov %rax,0x20(%rdi) 0x0000000000000023 <+35>: mov $0x1,%eax 0x0000000000000028 <+40>: retq 0x0000000000000029 <+41>: test %rax,%rax 0x000000000000002c <+44>: jns 0x7 0x000000000000002e <+46>: xor %eax,%eax 0x0000000000000030 <+48>: retq By using a rwsem microbenchmark, the down_read_trylock() rate (with a load of 10 to lengthen the lock critical section) on a x86-64 system before and after the patch were: Before Patch After Patch # of Threads rlock rlock ------------ ----- ----- 1 14,496 14,716 2 8,644 8,453 4 6,799 6,983 8 5,664 7,190 On a ARM64 system, the performance results were: Before Patch After Patch # of Threads rlock rlock ------------ ----- ----- 1 23,676 24,488 2 7,697 9,502 4 4,945 3,440 8 2,641 1,603 For the uncontended case (1 thread), the new down_read_trylock() is a little bit faster. For the contended cases, the new down_read_trylock() perform pretty well in x86-64, but performance degrades at high contention level on ARM64. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tim Chen Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: openrisc@lists.librecores.org Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190322143008.21313-4-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/rwsem.h | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h index 45ee00236e03..1f5775aa6a1d 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h @@ -174,14 +174,17 @@ static inline int __down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { - long tmp; + /* + * Optimize for the case when the rwsem is not locked at all. + */ + long tmp = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE; - while ((tmp = atomic_long_read(&sem->count)) >= 0) { - if (tmp == atomic_long_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, tmp, - tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) { + do { + if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &tmp, + tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) { return 1; } - } + } while (tmp >= 0); return 0; }