Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Cc:     baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Expose ISA direct mapping region via
 iommu_get_resv_regions
To:     James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>
References: <0F0C82BE-86E5-4BAC-938C-6F7629E18D27@arista.com>
 <83B82113-8AE5-4B0C-A079-F389520525BD@arista.com>
 <F531CABB-FFDA-4E0A-A3D5-095FF338DD5A@arista.com>
 <b6b3dda7-31e3-c1e8-16cb-07feb7d5431d@linux.intel.com>
 <A489539F-4DD4-438A-AD9A-1A2F50404DB9@arista.com>
 <fb1565dc-d991-acf9-e275-c0090f69f47e@linux.intel.com>
 <445F31EA-20F3-481C-B1DF-8B163791FF8C@arista.com>
 <cf43d26b-f1ee-8469-c17a-e5c412dcfeab@linux.intel.com>
 <6C211BF1-B5A0-4821-AB42-092B573DE667@arista.com>
 <8B1FC0C7-9BAC-498D-B1F0-0138EACF75C2@arista.com>
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <ddcaa472-7bff-ddd3-0518-f2ba694b3279@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:49:05 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8B1FC0C7-9BAC-498D-B1F0-0138EACF75C2@arista.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi James,

I did a sanity test from my end. The test machine fails to boot. I
haven't seen any valuable kernel log. It results in a purple screen.

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

On 3/29/19 11:26 PM, James Sewart wrote:
> Hey Lu,
> 
> I’ve attached a preliminary v3, if you could take a look and run some tests
> that would be great.
> 
> Since v2 i’ve added your default domain type patches, the new device_group
> handler, and incorporated Jacob’s feedback.
> 
>> On 28 Mar 2019, at 18:37, James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Lu,
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2019, at 01:24, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> On 3/25/19 8:57 PM, James Sewart wrote:
>>>>>> Theres an issue that if we choose to alloc a new resv_region with type
>>>>>> IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT, we will need to refactor intel_iommu_put_resv_regions
>>>>>> to free this entry type which means refactoring the rmrr regions in
>>>>>> get_resv_regions. Should this work be in this patchset?
>>>>> Do you mean the rmrr regions are not allocated in get_resv_regions, but
>>>>> are freed in put_resv_regions? I think we should fix this in this patch
>>>>> set since this might impact the device passthrough if we don't do it.
>>>> They’re not allocated and not freed currently, only type IOMMU_RESV_MSI is
>>>> freed in put_resv_regions. If we allocate a new resv_region with type
>>>> IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT for the isa region, then it won’t be freed. If we modify
>>>> put_resv_regions to free type IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT, then we will try to free
>>>> the static RMRR regions.
>>>> Either the ISA region is static and not freed as with my implementation,
>>>> or the RMRR regions are converted to be allocated on each call to
>>>> get_resv_regions and freed in put_resv_regions.
>>>
>>> By the way, there's another way in my mind. Let's add a new region type
>>> for LPC devices, e.x. IOMMU_RESV_LPC, and then handle it in the same way
>>> as those MSI regions. Just FYI.
>>
>> This solution would require adding some extra code to
>> iommu_group_create_direct_mappings as currently only type
>> IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT is identity mapped, other types are only reserved.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Lu Baolu
>>
>> Cheers,
>> James.
> 
> Cheers,
> James.
>