Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:32:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:32:49 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:7416 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:32:29 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20010405150219.B873@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <20010405150219.B873@mea-ext.zmailer.org> To: Matti Aarnio Cc: Bart Trojanowski , Manoj Sontakke , LKML Subject: Re: which gcc version? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:26:32 +0100 Message-ID: <25567.986473592@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org matti.aarnio@zmailer.org said: > To think of it, there really should be explicitely callable > versions of these with LinuxKernel names for them, not gcc > builtins.? That way people would *know* they are doing > something, which is potentially very slow. > (And the API would not change from underneath them.) Like include/asm-*/div64.h::do_div()? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/