Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1188756yba; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 06:06:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1aYV1jPbxkRJSzq1X7IR21P0CxjtBgRvy9UR2qR75kOWbItPjxozXnsWHOW5zJga+e4bj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2927:: with SMTP id g36mr6354988plb.57.1554383165168; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:06:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554383165; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D92YQr1j1DF1CCdiEgbmAAW/3z8q/F3slbfF0sYjAJJLAJWKAddVaWRIldZ/TkhXm0 8PUYqJYgJSFDcHCoKkvBu5sA5qRhbksLl7EYKvPYZ9V6jaDtVqjlPU5N63S+WmA+tZNV 0nv1J8TOhyrevjYTkYUiUOeFIYK3dQrxD4gJqPRX+uz300SgI9Hrz93ms05Rj/l0FTJC yDzJlUcMVoSlWr5MIt0UUBl2JXj+6iRYqHsjrWW4RPfLU17O2yoYhCcvCeyq4CCwS758 MrQ7Tk6am9jNMj8hhauSLRJWqOAdICtlvoJ2bb1Z8xac6o72ba6WLkBPQif4DYO9M+jH Vn/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=WPlEIfMarxdMuwuQN+csUicmM1PpW6F5XI6wi3gLWA0=; b=RgILB0bu77zHcApy2/Gi+IH9mbppPr2vS85cjgsq/cP3Rv5H+zLJ8cbpMhsFgq8TSq xGB7w6MzjDKX+i0954uS3t8kMEiZzTMUBfR1kbj3rp+eOumDJsMCBdrVRh4j1N2LLa40 sob/+goUbPk+yhP/ECJXXOALWDq4x/O9WIRRpse70efV+xxTIBrEaU2x/iKdh45mLP47 R9wZ3HJQKDcRwzB7uBQfqS92yOjmHnUhCkOoOo7nh7tkh5JaPBdkBZ0+NEBmCmPvi+bG bzkwJZoFjUBlbl/SaXXDSc2u5b1hOKVMZ1vChhUVFTC9NqLRfwoisbSrW6isEfm0LKY6 FI/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v3si11972596pga.354.2019.04.04.06.05.27; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729782AbfDDNDO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:03:14 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:59898 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726618AbfDDNDN (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:03:13 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D90AA78; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 06:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.40.100] (p8cg001049571a15.blr.arm.com [10.162.40.100]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C40303F68F; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 06:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove To: Oscar Salvador Cc: Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, cpandya@codeaurora.org, arunks@codeaurora.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, logang@deltatee.com, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, david@redhat.com, cai@lca.pw, Steven Price References: <1554265806-11501-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1554265806-11501-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <55278a57-39bc-be27-5999-81d0da37b746@arm.com> <20190404115815.gzk3sgg34eofyxfv@d104.suse.de> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <0c2b5096-a6df-b4ac-ac3b-3fec274837d3@arm.com> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 18:33:09 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190404115815.gzk3sgg34eofyxfv@d104.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/04/2019 05:28 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:09:22AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> Do these need to be __meminit? AFAICS it's effectively redundant with the containing #ifdef, and removal feels like it's inherently a later-than-init thing anyway. >> >> I was confused here a bit but even X86 does exactly the same. All these functions >> are still labeled __meminit and all wrapped under CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Is there >> any concern to have __meminit here ? > > We do not really need it as long as the code is within #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. > __meminit is being used when functions that are going to be need for hotplug need > to stay around. Makes sense. > > /* Used for MEMORY_HOTPLUG */ > #define __meminit __section(.meminit.text) __cold notrace \ > __latent_entropy > > #if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) > #define MEM_KEEP(sec) *(.mem##sec) > #define MEM_DISCARD(sec) > #else > #define MEM_KEEP(sec) > #define MEM_DISCARD(sec) *(.mem##sec) > #endif > > So it is kind of redundant to have both. > I will clean it up when reposting [1] and [2]. > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10875019/ > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10875021/ > Sure. Will remove them from the proposed functions next time around.