Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <8aa47dba7114d940d054140aa49eded1e479e3ef.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: Rocktech jh057n00900: Add terminating
 newlines to logging
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Guido =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:19:39 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20190404154850.GA19334@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
References: <cover.1554114302.git.agx@sigxcpu.org>
         <20190403161735.GN5238@ulmo>
         <1ed5eb3af4df6b2dd1544c7b696e034ed5c94f06.camel@perches.com>
         <20190404105359.GA8255@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
         <da6f2344396555034cf2476c8338b0ce1c56e0a7.camel@perches.com>
         <20190404154850.GA19334@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.1-1build1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 17:48 +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
> Hi Joe,
[]
> P.S.: The cc: list is huge, is there a reason for going way past what
> get_maintainers puts out for this patch?

No idea, I just used reply-all to your patch.