Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1494617yba; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:56:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqymCpXUsdaPJkty4DVsXMz2nJgDT9w4qZ7JI7tlwyYDlwzJmL+KSVrejd4JGU1Wbv/Qo7rg X-Received: by 2002:a65:5089:: with SMTP id r9mr7521010pgp.14.1554404196260; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:56:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554404196; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Uy6D3G8DNv+ZgExzmGTVdzQ/Oztdi4frt6Zu+XubL8R0V70ppIRabr8k0ncaE530y7 KoCedpp8LfiJrininonSHG8Sg0wvVzKGp+qgGWCN1gu/EwzCYgSkj6Uaj4uz8qOdk5gf 5in9LiUETz6dFMJU/Q7udQk1HhX332eu344gghGjEyA20+3DszGkol3P384US4m+VIFh smXsg9zYHXujagRf0gfpqK4wgdWpaTdpIYEs3OflqKYJTe//hebyLSVAiK3mXZbtEN/X 0HrdlyyBibt9lcmX//ahFBda7h9lTYo2CxlWee1duA6xdG5yaGuj+huZfLqkvYk+21pW /KRA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=IABmWUk7Ma/eFMtoGIGHc3YEKnB3XWGMSYVSlgvw1zo=; b=K94zSrfn9sHG62P/dtJghu062OdWZ1uRJ+pJzSLI+fMeGYaR6S+/T/Y//sCxjLSYY8 CvqPXKHt5L8P/dWmf6cLk9dZyQD5FPPamVlcXG3Sg4q+/w59zEtkG/yTWoI0T4h3P5FX hcopwilIFbIf+1q15m2qWE7vjF8xnNMvYhCXXBvFv1WNzJZlmVKhCv8FTnIRj+Y9rgLb hxdsg9eBTymZsBr7stTghtcM9Q9Ziml9ZIN+TqMuNaXCAyDKJMYHr0FSDYVaouvKkz5z RWm4+eCsy0jR1dpu4qtLeV/TrcdJqqIiolRLznNyXlWjVTH9gtOGyODaNVQ72qdlrI3s p8cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="qNSUVG/h"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bc1si16825662plb.55.2019.04.04.11.56.21; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="qNSUVG/h"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730033AbfDDSzo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:55:44 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:40030 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729925AbfDDSzl (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:55:41 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id q66so3036791ljq.7 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IABmWUk7Ma/eFMtoGIGHc3YEKnB3XWGMSYVSlgvw1zo=; b=qNSUVG/h25dEIaiFNlw22kwfRQCXlh+gsiELe8gpJB7CSlWyLh3rnQtot2DMZLk2gg 7lDFGlJG1PgEBY8+gmZOuGyJyiPsgebpbmweknL6SppKNwVoRsQFpZlhLCUqptHbhyKI C52eoDuzeuGoODW0JFleKhAj1/ogtQMb7EQj6VdXjhlGXKb3sqRlEIIIoE3uRKB6F0IB HPkhc3oSGuuHlCf53CxMg3ht5EIOBRYhpm/OVRvlU98SzT1aXqNJIDCKCfxWr4Lpayem l7c0qoYsdBF1yrcB3TTLc2b8zMjN4YeKOFLac8g6Nee2nd5wBSfhezer6xbJ5RJqPBfB vj1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IABmWUk7Ma/eFMtoGIGHc3YEKnB3XWGMSYVSlgvw1zo=; b=Gr2vAFYy6/7ZgWxEHlwRWctdpEs27D83gOvIghvoWtK5YxrLRqRLSp9SKS1JfMroDR GFh0hX7HwAMnC/qykOOmcY714IqNweSEugumgN344RanVU97iK/ANDbRZ1p2oQglIc9d 4QUqYKcOV62vH4IjX+SyBT0tIw90dikUbYQDas82dYYR4logsEt1lROkbTwF0G2lIIIf YOBnIfOMMgjs7nO9aWpxaLE3wTjVRVHb1sCm3tLKp7S9/zM/qtUgeg7VebsILNuzLyQw vX3wILNIGtLQiDt20MA1+cegWThsA2nMquzg3LOAr8PB/QAab1O3YcQ7HHjATvhrB8At 5fBA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUf4CWJ8fRXXmczKCi+s0yMJzcU9n7J72vFdDyh1qO6/sNv2JSd GvWZ/PXruLdjfB7VuxaSwPyFtxU65kfgMZBAYZsxXg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:219:: with SMTP id 25mr4358340ljc.34.1554404138712; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:55:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190404171007.160878-1-ncrews@chromium.org> <20190404171007.160878-3-ncrews@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:55:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] platform/chrome: Standardize Chrome OS keyboard backlight name To: Nick Crews Cc: Guenter Roeck , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Benson Leung , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Jacek Anaszewski , Pavel Machek , Alexandre Belloni , Alessandro Zummo , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Duncan Laurie , Simon Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:41 AM Nick Crews wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:36 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:11 AM Nick Crews wrote: > > > > > > > > We want all backlights for the system keyboard to > > > > use a common name, so the name "platform::kbd_backlight" > > > > would be better than the current "chromeos::kbd_backlight" > > > > name. Normally this wouldn't be worth changing, but the new > > > > Wilco keyboard backlight driver uses the "platform" name. > > > > We want to make it so all Chrome OS devices are consistent, > > > > so we'll change the name here too. > > > > > > > > > > Wondering - who is the "we" you are talking about ? > > You're right, I should have been more precise. > I was referring to Pavel, Enric, and myself. Pavel had this opinion here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/4/1040. I don't know what Pavel meant by "we" > in that comment, but I would guess that could mean the other LED maintainers > as well? I talked with Enric 1:1 and he didn't see the problem with changing it, > though perhaps he was only considering our use of the LED via powerd, > and not users in general. I'm guessing Pavel's and Enric's meanings though, > excuse me if I am misinterpreting. > > > > > This also has a potential of breaking existing setups if somebody did > > happen to match on entire name instead of suffix. Such changes have to > > be considered very carefully; at this point I am against of doing > > this. > > Would it make sense to keep the old name as is, and only make the new > Wilco name begin with "platform:"? What would you think is best? Given that we do not have a single instance of platform::kbd_backlight in kernel at this time I have no idea why Pavel is trying to push this for Wilco driver. Thanks. -- Dmitry