Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp572966yba; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziVXLvY275arT77AdWuPiahxf8hwGTWbG0TFcipLeXoUMmTbkxVsfo9V7p8NNTAg3nDPSB X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f089:: with SMTP id go9mr14260588plb.309.1554492182307; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554492182; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iK/GL4lErAeJF9WJJ3hZOrWXfQhAnHgR6ek3JD37mAaIqcRFh8UrKsG+w4cp5ZDS18 Kylh6za5mKx2/OvfcRjkVCDUj5GfQzd1LYmouuOCuBvH8BgVSfnnCN38wfksUZ9Q26dP 1VqSXFAGTo0O7DYrE6OwlL/D+xYs2qzXU5VEv6LjBKAQXZGe4Rq+CjGo7fMRk8BD6j6q bv6Qa4Wy3UykEOjOk8TMYaJWzfnYHqiEVe0IG63AYrCkxXPffuSVkPCmu0kcSDl6tmOJ MJRrAzm486W9tJu+fCMpxxo+D0b70L8KXInkpt0I4i6FuHnWMOqRO+/WbrG8WmBUmYGC htxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=8k+lGQv6up0VMd1ZfWX/+THPUCQR/49/LgOgBTqFPYc=; b=KX8n5eG6BxVmePKpETV7LU5VohL+KuvWX2moXIMp1fDFIn0ocPA5W7+TW1/q8Oui/v yMPYzE3yvTSBZGKr4FG2Rg2sOZgK0Xx1y46tqAgVLe1irCtmJoBRVRwcASYYZ/WdjSDI 3TJppQQ+gOnkYgLxQJrkEWo5ZK/bi+mLtzSxKzxsn+6k10B/mTLcBSJidPgrKxrcXBg2 u5Cj7F31yfL7hrMhDfixlK6Nm2d1OaIzLtrk5gitxpk2xDnsVSLa9HDhRHyzDh1Ux1LW TZZjiNaT6stcDetKhIMmFOVeaYA5jgDj9Z1pBUMqiR8wCnAkKZIBmuATZ88r1CY4f2fF nlow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q11si19454522pff.201.2019.04.05.12.22.47; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731860AbfDETWG (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:22:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42474 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731183AbfDETWF (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:22:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C5F309EA78; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 19:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.com (dhcp-17-47.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.47]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BFB61354; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 19:22:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Waiman Long To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Linus Torvalds , Tim Chen , Waiman Long Subject: [PATCH-tip v2 04/12] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return owner state Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:21:07 -0400 Message-Id: <20190405192115.17416-5-longman@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190405192115.17416-1-longman@redhat.com> References: <20190405192115.17416-1-longman@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Fri, 05 Apr 2019 19:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch modifies rwsem_spin_on_owner() to return four possible values to better reflect the state of lock holder which enables us to make a better decision of what to do next. In the special case that there is no active lock and the handoff bit is set, optimistic spinning has to be stopped. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long --- kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/locking/rwsem.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c index 4f036bda9063..35891c53338b 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c @@ -281,14 +281,30 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) } /* - * Return true only if we can still spin on the owner field of the rwsem. + * Return the folowing 4 values depending on the lock owner state. + * OWNER_NULL : owner is currently NULL + * OWNER_WRITER: when owner changes and is a writer + * OWNER_READER: when owner changes and the new owner may be a reader. + * OWNER_NONSPINNABLE: + * when optimistic spinning has to stop because either the + * owner stops running, is unknown, or its timeslice has + * been used up. */ -static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +enum owner_state { + OWNER_NULL = 1 << 0, + OWNER_WRITER = 1 << 1, + OWNER_READER = 1 << 2, + OWNER_NONSPINNABLE = 1 << 3, +}; +#define OWNER_SPINNABLE (OWNER_NULL | OWNER_WRITER) + +static noinline enum owner_state rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { struct task_struct *owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner); + long count; if (!is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(owner)) - return false; + return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE; rcu_read_lock(); while (owner && (READ_ONCE(sem->owner) == owner)) { @@ -306,7 +322,7 @@ static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) */ if (need_resched() || !owner_on_cpu(owner)) { rcu_read_unlock(); - return false; + return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE; } cpu_relax(); @@ -315,9 +331,19 @@ static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) /* * If there is a new owner or the owner is not set, we continue - * spinning. + * spinning except when here is no active locks and the handoff bit + * is set. In this case, we have to stop spinning. */ - return is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(READ_ONCE(sem->owner)); + owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner); + if (!is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(owner)) + return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE; + if (owner && !is_rwsem_owner_reader(owner)) + return OWNER_WRITER; + + count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count); + if (RWSEM_COUNT_HANDOFF(count) && !RWSEM_COUNT_LOCKED(count)) + return OWNER_NONSPINNABLE; + return !owner ? OWNER_NULL : OWNER_READER; } static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem) @@ -340,7 +366,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem) * 2) readers own the lock as we can't determine if they are * actively running or not. */ - while (rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem)) { + while (rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem) & OWNER_SPINNABLE) { /* * Try to acquire the lock */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h index 2befb5ab1181..3ba235491dc1 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h @@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ static inline bool is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(struct task_struct *owner) return !((unsigned long)owner & RWSEM_ANONYMOUSLY_OWNED); } +static inline bool is_rwsem_owner_reader(struct task_struct *owner) +{ + return (unsigned long)owner & RWSEM_READER_OWNED; +} + /* * Return true if rwsem is owned by an anonymous writer or readers. */ -- 2.18.1