Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190405192115.17416-1-longman@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190405192115.17416-1-longman@redhat.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:27:37 -1000
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgnPRBy_YkY771qdetwViEZ8uWwZpjxAOs_UsvzRV3rpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip v2 00/12] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2
To:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:22 AM Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  v2:
>   - Move the negative reader count checking patch (patch 12->10)
>     forward to before the merge owner to count patch as suggested by
>     Linus & expand the comment.

All looks good to me now.

I didn't apply and _test_ any of the patches, but they look sane and
the numbers you quote are compelling.

So ack as far as I'm concerned,

                   Linus