Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1294780yba; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:28:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoQ13P2ojej2Q9L7UAIRNFf6S1DrjLTmGFZK8QnbGVhYKVsq7ZFcEMbFNbX42qN56RmoGk X-Received: by 2002:a62:b61a:: with SMTP id j26mr19411113pff.203.1554564525906; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:28:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554564525; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oWJAAePo9GgU67gV7WSRlvuqRMUWsXv/dIE9XN4MntuSeVy91GJCMX3N5sr8FLD9oU FDWTtJiPFOmL3FbLqFdL3WSu4REn5Emxm4r/QJSeX2joCjIwf60Q+IXGyaB5KHuRQ6lf bxgg5i5E1CifyplmMNs3juxPtGrs5Q3mW2ANcMD/28ZM3Xn942h7Ytqke/oq+FA5mLu1 P+QYBKPylt63Ylt8enyxcf0wAcX946o5as6XRZDuGXgTopD3+bkTGuEwI0sV8/ZLdG5V g+swD6aYzTYopoUgNGcpH5OeDLfL1atB8jRk/aqUi0UZwc60RS1qvGVmPOnj++a/gNtZ /UFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:cc:to:from :date; bh=YMTAvCCXcp/+kseiecLuHHm5luU53jFkZB76D6BNR08=; b=s8ZgTwH8JFJfTPwsfDm3YiRClnUvew4pe7hgpBaagwlvmqlK4eVqP0EhY1CsVwiSHW n4YV4NsS2BUFj039NR3vtVkpwZhyvf04U6FLt6/9N07mozgPUJpywzRiyvw6YC9QJqas AzG6NKlrt/ySMO1XK2gyWviyGcvLQSBVA/x9z0Wx1MMUyTDmt1xwQ1Xcop+2y30O8wL1 94gR/mJ0JfUPUPUtKFNYYbjd0LcdP7AxjwCSSz4MiuTZWDV14SzZurgtSY9GR1IWzIgT T6lzn4Do34N3C2Id3Ss2C6TCdQNlmDL8RqYD2aqFoBeW8siMP+4QpIYpvlNwiq14JJF9 F1ow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 33si21906740ply.361.2019.04.06.08.28.30; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726630AbfDFPUz (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:20:55 -0400 Received: from bout01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.11.15]:51062 "EHLO bout01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726501AbfDFPUy (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:20:54 -0400 Received: from mx01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.211]) by bout01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1hCn7l-0006N8-Gq; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 09:20:53 -0600 Received: from plesk14-shared.xmission.com ([166.70.198.161] helo=plesk14.xmission.com) by mx01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1hCn7l-0006ud-1e; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 09:20:53 -0600 Received: from hacktheplanet (c-68-50-23-202.hsd1.in.comcast.net [68.50.23.202]) by plesk14.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C9FB1BF275; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 15:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:20:45 -0400 From: Scott Bauer To: David Kozub Cc: Jens Axboe , Jonathan Derrick , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Rabenstein Message-ID: <20190406152045.GF10294@hacktheplanet> References: <1550103368-4605-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <1550103368-4605-15-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1550103368-4605-15-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-XM-SPF: eid=1hCn7l-0006ud-1e;;;mid=<20190406152045.GF10294@hacktheplanet>;;;hst=mx01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.198.161;;;frm=sbauer@plzdonthack.me;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.198.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sbauer@plzdonthack.me X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong,XM_UncommonTLD01 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.5 XM_UncommonTLD01 Less-common TLD * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;David Kozub X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 233 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.31 (0.1%), signal_user_changed: 3.4 (1.5%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.9%), parse: 0.84 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (5.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.84 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (8.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.35 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.12 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 18 (7.6%), check_bayes: 16 (6.9%), b_tokenize: 5 (2.2%), b_tok_get_all: 4.9 (2.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.66 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.4 (1.0%), b_finish: 0.64 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 164 (70.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.61 (0.3%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.4 (1.1%), poll_dns_idle: 0.41 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.9%), tests_pri_500: 8 (3.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] block: sed-opal: pass steps via argument rather than via opal_dev X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Fri, 13 May 2016 17:07:30 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 01:16:06AM +0100, David Kozub wrote: > The steps argument is only read by the next function, so it can > be passed directly as an argument rather than via opal_dev. > > Normally, the steps is an array on the stack, so the pointer stops > being valid then the function that set opal_dev.steps returns. > If opal_dev.steps was not set to NULL before return it would become > a dangling pointer. When the steps are passed as argument this > becomes easier to see and more difficult to misuse. > > Signed-off-by: David Kozub Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer