Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1370330yba; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwLr5LK6eI6K3zjoD7jzACBgzMcRs8hlRyV7J2yubw1Dmk7InVZjD6Q79EXs4ZDrHwQM0lb X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:469:: with SMTP id 96mr19858957ple.46.1554571463518; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554571463; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0PK7OYFSka7j1pflqBQOrn7d6IB2UUpWsnD5aptN9ohNKhHVzkaRfkljvQem3LFJtW shW+yaDl2zhJ/znz0JlnBN9KyIQyOawHh0fczcwSUkmqIyMwdYUHGiuIZz8D11z9Ryrx dlsp6C8+45/AoVJ9ou98ns50HMijMup4qLKQ4pi5wa+PKNSmPCRin3ZsYgaYKEPwLweT RA+W3MVE9eZHFPcfBWcUdIcIFSntXnqJV8uQXcBwl4hOvYRWp1ktDO4ZOSRrQneEztjv cG0cVuRHLlhCECnnKZesGckNGyAzataM+G2z/ui9kjIskhog6bobFe8WIkrMOc+cjjqp or6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:subject:from :date; bh=uvOIFnjA1EW8GWJD1tTjZ+ExEYJw2hek+XXBm3vor2s=; b=miwgkaCTqSa5VJXq5fPTXsa2AWD5n2Tfu6hDiM3BM9bFBV1VQtrG9acnsr/t9pdiee Z/345Th4jDd5gCeKG8AhYg/KWs2CkiFRQXeVINNHTkExD45JCrD+zdEmFqwfMlEz4Rh3 CZiisOeftu5ofQRtg4e8XVZi4Wpcdq2560HBut9GON1v7LMSGRbujVI1n9PY67BD3OFM Br8QtMy+o2jgQU2M+WsKL0SAKJNg7F5z4gUVYn209IYuHz3QQ6UbQfBGdpY30/Ckdm4w 51oXaN5QheDu06X2/GZ5cWE4ggrxMvCHQTvHbDXxlQf/tx2NukQuc+FqunHxtK332M5a PJKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m17si22862065pff.130.2019.04.06.10.24.08; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726625AbfDFRW5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:22:57 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:55104 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726467AbfDFRW5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:22:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x36HDMYU048155 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:22:56 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rpr6j8s1r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 13:22:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:22:54 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:22:50 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x36HMnag51839108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 17:22:49 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEE95204F; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 17:22:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.124.219.134]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4297452052; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 17:22:49 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 22:52:47 +0530 From: "Naveen N. Rao" Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: fix compilation when KPROBE_EVENTS is enabled without kretpobes To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy , "David S. Miller" , Masami Hiramatsu References: <20190406155543.15353-1-svens@stackframe.org> In-Reply-To: <20190406155543.15353-1-svens@stackframe.org> User-Agent: astroid/0.14.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19040617-0028-0000-0000-0000035DF835 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19040617-0029-0000-0000-0000241D0E42 Message-Id: <1554570896.uirb80qggp.naveen@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-04-06_15:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904060119 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sven Schnelle wrote: > While implementing kprobes on PA-RISC (without kretprobes) compilation > fails when CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS is enabled: Thanks for working on that! Is there a specific reason kretprobes is not being enabled on parisc? > > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.o: in function `trace_kprobe_create': > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:666: undefined reference to `kprobe_on_func_entry' > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.o: in function `trace_kprobe_on_func_entry': > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:167: undefined reference to `kprobe_on_func_entry' > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:167: undefined reference to `kprobe_on_func_entry' > make: *** [Makefile:1029: vmlinux] Error 1 > > Given the fact that these functions have no dependencies on kretprobes i think > they should be moved out of the #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES block. > > Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" > Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy > Cc: "David S. Miller" > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu > --- > kernel/kprobes.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) These functions were originally added only for kretprobes, but have taken on newer uses since then. So, for this patch: Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao However, I wonder if we should simply remove CONFIG_KRETPROBES altogether. All architectures supporting kprobes today also support kretprobes. I don't see why anyone would want to only disable kretprobes. - Naveen