Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:20:12 -0700
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>, arm@kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: iop: don't use using 64-bit DMA masks
Message-ID: <20190407222012.cqbo64w6mmtdfr6i@localhost>
References: <20190325155101.3544731-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20190325155101.3544731-2-arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190325155101.3544731-2-arnd@arndb.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> clang warns about statically defined DMA masks from the DMA_BIT_MASK
> macro with length 64:
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/setup.c:303:35: error: shift count >= width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow]
>  static u64 iop13xx_adma_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  include/linux/dma-mapping.h:141:54: note: expanded from macro 'DMA_BIT_MASK'
>  #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
>                                                       ^ ~~~
> 
> The ones in iop shouldn't really be 64 bit masks, so changing them
> to what the driver can support avoids the warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>


Applied to fixes.


-Olof