Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2938140yba; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:50:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXx2whGDg6m1xT/5kE/GBEE0/hIO8oDtTh8ETgHc5CAbrvIuUrQAPoUeqV6/cO2wWabBHs X-Received: by 2002:a62:1249:: with SMTP id a70mr30174412pfj.160.1554735031243; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 07:50:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554735031; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O84gI8EvSpvEGKAtr5hDsHdcNINHoXtpqUseeM9B572e1K1nkX7Q96a/pN15gtKogf 0Oondh9Hr1VJNrYdBuX/8r83w5Wli+vDU+vqqtuVsDAN7nCeeIvFLkjqZpy2j/lsASMx Ysh4pzl5KXwW6cPYgs4DHUIstGc3cKua8RQtFe1iGeAZKjyona7ASjpex/l6MlN/SxIb 7AHJpfADJOxyXym5Ad7KJ3vyPyU1Ud8zxITW2dEDGLEqh7Jb3CY5nynWuGKsH71c8ULm TQeZXDtq1+H0/lhEV35qsD0DdDK5vxhowrhFwwj+++lBektltAd/PrRR/QJIH1fFG7pK 624w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=LOdvu9UDd9Y9ll13siTapSebLabXDBH5kBukyA5gDbY=; b=ojAsO6T6ELZMXoglu0z7Si1eSvzYDnS8sVcz/b2wM5ebYDTSWZDfyWu5TCXcj1L8eT RFhwe+90m7alRUCZWPhQCkJ+mLblYBEE2yoTPWb/nK93e3O7y8lifNdHavrXm7lwXdz7 sA2uBNE4O+rmJCu4MQFKLSyn9wsS8Fpy/IqnB/voTVWHU/nU1j6bqTt35OA/K9/Qzteu iFJfohhK7DzMNUyWcB24Gp45g+eGZZmAHbH1gqx9Ex4XxbqLT1Utr1LzPX8fm0+jCVZB awwpT2+0pMbgolC9wJ3DWiackX/QFuWSGg+NFBVi4Z6uZNlrJUfd8Kk1wweXGxNrcEc+ kcvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t10si26108538plr.229.2019.04.08.07.50.15; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 07:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727266AbfDHOt1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:49:27 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38920 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726005AbfDHOt1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:49:27 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07E4B00F; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:49:25 +0200 From: Johannes Thumshirn To: Paolo Valente Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name, Angelo Ruocco Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block, bfq: delete "bfq" prefix from cgroup filenames Message-ID: <20190408144925.GA23021@linux-x5ow.site> References: <20190408143935.9062-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> <20190408143935.9062-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190408143935.9062-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 04:39:35PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: > From: Angelo Ruocco > > When bfq was merged into mainline, there were two I/O schedulers that > implemented the proportional-share policy: bfq for blk-mq and cfq for > legacy blk. bfq's interface files in the blkio/io controller have the > same names as cfq. But the cgroups interface doesn't allow two > entities to use the same name for their files, so for bfq we had to > prepend the "bfq" prefix to each of its files. However no legacy code > uses these modified file names. This naming also causes confusion, as, > e.g., in [1]. > > Now cfq has gone with legacy blk, so there is no need any longer for > these prefixes in (the never used) bfq names. In view of this fact, this > commit removes these prefixes, thereby enabling legacy code to truly > use the proportional share policy in blk-mq. > > [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7057 Hmm, but isn't this a user-space facing interface and thus some sort of ABI? Do you know what's using it and what breaks due to this conversion? -- Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850