Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3135590yba; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:56:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTDbXXSdE/WgnvmI2gnkLh+5MqWSgAkq59G46MR7IXbwQnbQoOVJXmJayDRLFGLkx5Pi+S X-Received: by 2002:a65:62c9:: with SMTP id m9mr27898634pgv.309.1554749807175; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:56:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554749807; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Houm1DKQl4RQHLoAJnrzliUck21GiBa/CzUjuEIaDHqP/eTn9hKbmcXF+AAmuBkXB9 SyysxprW6UILwbszLCRQVyLqH/Espylc9xWI3Lo0gwuLXgP5EvV9q+WuctR3Qre622t8 cj2w2hTE2hmQ6/0R2PrmxTrBsM+H3MSpy7IcZ7YxHa+PF/RiK4h7d7bH3wLJToKHn5PQ 6GG2Gfx3l+CrVEnXnVkyp/mT8ulxdhrLcQVAR3M+a4tYPVROFHIg1wbRnUABLwpZjGOc ZR+dcQXSyPHcrMvHrcyAuJMu2TxJGCXfm/3K6tDfhI0VZU0gNQ/kF70pEmEZ1HtC44ih 6ZWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=SyREHgGFqzZv3hX6EhOohBSvhTD0FcWiKqV7zGipOb4=; b=deYA1FOa7gtlQBdKUCWenISMtLJAihhEzXleqHjlx6C4pjkAXWCT63MQ90kEV8g1jh dIN/p/jb2l/Y/LjrrvfAAx1MjXY1ky1wUxwZiuKO9niVyBI83bqNoecptM5NOnN5MC+Q IO1YfBRUpK6iJBj+yX64dvjyDTLdmlkUXo8LMRfbD3Q8MmTaDWYYRBACB2pS8NF4kuMy TIfk1AvCpyYEv/I70n/fHGO0j2SLm73Ky7iMjKotW9ofkQCPJQ1oYYunO3cU82i9Ll+w MTiKyaHXeD3JBE6Dd9jBV5ED8hLAGGidFjeveagny8mRxDB1oHqU2i00opKWFuPsWUxt 6cnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q4si9362537pls.76.2019.04.08.11.56.31; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726661AbfDHSP2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:15:28 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:56333 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726220AbfDHSP1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:15:27 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2019 11:15:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,326,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="159317003" Received: from raj-desk2.iind.intel.com ([10.223.107.30]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2019 11:15:23 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:32:03 +0530 From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj To: Rajat Jain Cc: Vishwanath Somayaji , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wysocki@google.com, Rafael J , Srinivas Pandruvada , furquan@google.com, evgreen@google.com, rajatxjain@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Instantiate pmc_core device on legacy platforms Message-ID: <20190408180202.GA769@raj-desk2.iind.intel.com> References: <20190313222124.229371-1-rajatja@google.com> <20190405203558.19160-1-rajatja@google.com> <20190405203558.19160-3-rajatja@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190405203558.19160-3-rajatja@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 01:35:58PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > Add code to instantiate the pmc_core platform device and thus attach to > the driver, if the ACPI device for the same ("INT33A1") is not present > in a system where it should be. This was discussed here: > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1966991.html > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain > --- > v3: (first version of *this* patch -to go with rest of v3 patchset) > v2: (does not exist) > v1: (does not exist) > > drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 2 +- > .../platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c Can we call this intel_pmc_core_plat_drv.c instead? > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile > index 86cb76677bc8..83d0bb9a14bb 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_BXTWC_PMIC_TMU) += intel_bxtwc_tmu.o > obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TELEMETRY) += intel_telemetry_core.o \ > intel_telemetry_pltdrv.o \ > intel_telemetry_debugfs.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_CORE) += intel_pmc_core.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_CORE) += intel_pmc_core.o intel_pmc_core_plat_init.o ditto > obj-$(CONFIG_PMC_ATOM) += pmc_atom.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MLX_PLATFORM) += mlx-platform.o > obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3) += intel_turbo_max_3.o > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..45be89e7586c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c > @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +/* > + * Intel PMC Core platform init > + * Copyright (c) 2019, Google Inc. I'd like to consult Andy and Darren if we should also have Intel Copyright too? > + * Author - Rajat Jain > + * > + * This code instantiates platform devices for intel_pmc_core driver, only > + * on supported platforms that may not have the ACPI devices in the ACPI tables. > + * No new platforms should be added here, because we expect that new platforms > + * should all have the ACPI device, which is the preferred way of enumeration. > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > +#include > + > +static struct platform_device pmc_core_device = { > + .name = "pmc_core", > +}; > + > +static int dummy; > +/* > + * INTEL_CPU_FAM6 macro won't take NULL for driver_data (uses &driver_data), > + * thus provide a dummy driver_data. > + */ > +static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = { > + INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_MOBILE, dummy), > + INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_DESKTOP, dummy), > + INTEL_CPU_FAM6(KABYLAKE_MOBILE, dummy), > + INTEL_CPU_FAM6(KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, dummy), > + INTEL_CPU_FAM6(CANNONLAKE_MOBILE, dummy), > + INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ICELAKE_MOBILE, dummy), > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_pmc_core_ids); > + > +static int __init pmc_core_platform_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + /* Skip creating the platform device if ACPI already has a device */ > + if (acpi_dev_present("INT33A1", NULL, -1) || > + !x86_match_cpu(intel_pmc_core_ids)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + ret = platform_device_register(&pmc_core_device); > + if (ret) > + return ret; we can just return platform_devie_register (...) and avoid extra lines and variable. > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void __exit pmc_core_platform_exit(void) > +{ > + if (!acpi_dev_present("INT33A1", NULL, -1) && > + x86_match_cpu(intel_pmc_core_ids)) > + platform_device_unregister(&pmc_core_device); > +} > + > +module_init(pmc_core_platform_init); > +module_exit(pmc_core_platform_exit); > -- > 2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog > -- Best Regards, Rajneesh