Subject: Re: [PATCH] mask ADT: new mask.h file [2/22]
From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
Reply-To: colpatch@us.ibm.com
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040331165830.3b7e0aec.pj@sgi.com>
References: <20040329041253.5cd281a5.pj@sgi.com>
	 <1080779931.9787.3.camel@arrakis>  <20040331165830.3b7e0aec.pj@sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: IBM LTC
Message-Id: <1080781885.9787.61.camel@arrakis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:11:28 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1180
Lines: 26

On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:58, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Question:
> 
> Matthew, Bill, Andrew, anyone - how should I present the next version of
> this set of 22 give or take patches in this set?  Another new set of 22
> lkml posts; one reply or 22 replies to the some post on the existing
> threads; tarballs; web site URL; ...  The possibilities are varied.
> 
> My inclination would be just as I did it the first time - some 22
> rapid fire separate posts.  But I'm game for considering alternatives.

I'd prefer (especially since I'm on the CC line ;) that you send out the
[0/22] mail, and send all the rest of the mails (the actual patches) as
replies to that first mail.  That way, at least all of the emails are in
the same thread and can easily be collapsed/expanded.  I know when I
checked my mail monday morning and there were all those individual
mails, I thought I'd broken something and people were out for my blood!
;)

-Matt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/