Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@opentech.at>
To:     Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@opentech.at>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] NFC: st95hf: use msleep for long delay
Date:   Tue,  9 Apr 2019 05:48:18 +0200
Message-Id: <1554781699-42604-1-git-send-email-hofrat@opentech.at>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

usleep_ranges is backed by hrtimers - for a delay of 50ms
notably in a loop using a hrtimer is of no benefit and
msleep() should be fine  here (see
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt).

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@opentech.at>
---

Problem located with an experimental coccinelle script

Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + SPI=y,
NFC=y, NFC_DIGITAL=y, NFC_ST95HF=m

Patch is against 5.1-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20190408)

 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index a50a95c..34bf1d7 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static int st95hf_por_sequence(struct st95hf_context *st95context)
 			st95hf_send_spi_reset_sequence(st95context);
 
 		/* delay of 50 milisecond */
-		usleep_range(50000, 51000);
+		msleep(50);
 	} while (nth_attempt++ < 3);
 
 	return -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.1.4