Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3668544yba; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 02:09:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySiNwilk2VDwdsYK97+dcEFbNMxbUeyvnr5fDuXjhogBAH/ccjR/qPUOZH+zqUZtjM9tHY X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9296:: with SMTP id j22mr36018758pfa.140.1554800953531; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:09:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554800953; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OMRM7TSI1r8xpaakZmD3wHaBKPNsVpiGx6WJCglHbGqm/vWRHL4ip+ObbG9m7ly2bt 9l+GD7TRCGgkncMB3pZV/+WoZoGjbDrYGh2DAglbFKre9t6wSMdkSixy3MnjfihBxvzn IOpIxRNb5YT8zyZK2OBBzuAYX8FQ9vTMOHD/Q0SMml5WKYOz5plY0iF/qe0H8IVOG8MD tXLt2Pd69LciX9n9A5syzjzLaiGfgAH2dP88G+tYD+29HB5ZRsUvdH5oz7aMuuE/Oj/a O7GxVR5TYt9jW6mjR2wvExfMbGLR0zpxLSx7xomKdA6STX9qHc0B6h6C+D6AvmWCcwwa fH6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=jiBy5RRRTqg5OdOcbnJEnDi6Tzr+NTnRMya9wFlIzJc=; b=mHABBnRsHsrpphv4CSSiKNt1faec+okcVI5v42tPN/44eMOX2xtD9gk69PhasyhufF LIwdG/eGweBdxvEXc3GjWGVVY7rB+Hfda36ADqDfCg4KMAiYh1goKKZaUtd39vaEFk3/ +/wtOlqPXnunZGWwytk5YCSBkj/JmAy5n90lQDU4t27jwvWYOZdNpStevL3EitKPIs0F 6RnRSvAejWgiXy8lqGh8LrT5g+b3VKlczyixhdR7zj2s14tCyuBE91Fb1yo7bLATMQVD cY1pPNUJH94beMejnrnNQ/cOYp5s1d68HHikFl5dF7h22knHigGqzwZzP9kWphVoVC+7 YoBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w15si28667489pgj.427.2019.04.09.02.08.57; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726371AbfDIJIM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 05:08:12 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:38270 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726001AbfDIJIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 05:08:12 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 90249B177B81D34F2DA8; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:08:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.131.64) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:08:01 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump To: Bhupesh Sharma , , , , , , References: <20190403030546.23718-1-chenzhou10@huawei.com> <49012d55-2020-e2ac-1102-59a5f3911a29@redhat.com> CC: , , , , From: Chen Zhou Message-ID: <573f2b4b-9a55-d9b2-6de5-0b60eba0b211@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:07:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49012d55-2020-e2ac-1102-59a5f3911a29@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.131.64] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bhupesh, On 2019/4/9 13:20, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Hi Chen, > > Thanks for the patchset. > > Before I review the patches in detail, I have a couple of generic queries. Please see them in-line: > > On 04/03/2019 11:05 AM, Chen Zhou wrote: >> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should reserve >> some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers. So there may >> be two crash kernel regions, one is below 4G, the other is above 4G. >> >> Crash dump kernel reads more than one crash kernel regions via a dtb >> property under node /chosen, >> linux,usable-memory-range = . >> >> Besides, we need to modify kexec-tools: >> arm64: support more than one crash kernel regions >> >> Chen Zhou (3): >> arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G >> arm64: kdump: support more than one crash kernel regions >> kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64 >> >> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 +- >> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 3 + >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++---- >> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + >> mm/memblock.c | 40 +++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > I am wondering about the use-case for the same. I remember normally fedora-based arm64 systems can do well with a maximum crashkernel size of <=512MB reserved below the 4G boundary. > > So, do you mean that for your use-case (may be a huawei board based setup?), you need: > > - more than 512MB of crashkernel size, or > - you want to split the crashkernel reservation across the 4GB boundary irrespective of the crashkernel size value. > > Thanks, > Bhupesh > > > . > I do this based on below reasons. 1. ARM64 kdump support crashkernel=Y[@X], but now it seems unusable if X is specified above 4GB. 2. There are some cases we couldn't reserve 512MB crashkernel below 4G successfully if there is no continous 512MB system RAM below 4GB. In this case, we need to reserve crashkernel above 4GB. 3. As the memory increases, the bitmap_size in makedumpfile may also increases, we need more memory in kdump capture kernel for kernel dump. Thanks, Chen Zhou