Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3944526yba; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 08:00:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCZ3+HzThYk0J9oh5gb7GvRPZBVvkKN3tDqwC2GFc2QmTrr5hNWfjQ6ToZimCEG6BU1/d1 X-Received: by 2002:a65:4183:: with SMTP id a3mr36044233pgq.121.1554822018696; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 08:00:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554822018; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WHeJEPOpmI/bcChoPgQdbBCFxBhEtiNQY63lbCczKcCzF4XFTTJUTlytInghLQyrbt GnDDF8jFYm9lMi595160DynhFdSl6UgfPSx9FxF4FqNS4pPLOssdYHs0XTpT5tR8cK0n Kz2hhPcNWHD4QG38nNBElop7AXEzNbVFtdfIRI3qyAjKJh4snYQzemBSmFe8P2AYpwmL Ln/dwTnirQxdmta2twVLndD4lINdVNm29ShzCxMfKVV5/ISS3Rfj1qWEntEnqm8w8rTR gi7h6GbjXh53Co0HiM6Z8Y1eedv2EcaSfzL7qSw1t1eZOJACjoa12Ng/Zc2tFTDONIwz KpLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=94/sOdc799IBHzQi8CJyEwlWwtCWFLR5p1k4gHHBMD8=; b=EuNnrCIK8LFv4tCTny18RossInc3GTs3bO4v4hhelysr5a6G/m76E4KZ2HQawIOPmG 5AHCCtSosLsPJI5alj/N6x40XWpuWQ+FnUG5FQ88UJOnnYjsr35CkOj0BXRWDCgfEH+a 58LtnoOX8ikSblpI0B5y737wkdNeSZl+uQuaFkrtNQgkC9JrKwx+wrzH8xd1M13saezi JK2rgsh57VU6xvqgvsEeefZIbhIyum2OGVoqe7XdwyoNItuUeGzkebHn3Na/7tScm4ic 9YW+wGtN0GyVL4z7wIxMHF0TXY3KNSDu5Ouw8qERRL00NSK22+VOGLHrCHVZWwEp+sRc lxgA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j21si20226874pgm.232.2019.04.09.08.00.02; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 08:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726626AbfDIO5n (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:57:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54980 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726446AbfDIO5n (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:57:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EC22C976E; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from treble (ovpn-120-231.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.231]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5118619731; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:57:40 -0500 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Raphael Gault Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, julien.thierry@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] objtool: Add support for Arm64 Message-ID: <20190409145740.z5xufcrrwe7a7cig@treble> References: <20190409135243.12424-1-raphael.gault@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190409135243.12424-1-raphael.gault@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Tue, 09 Apr 2019 14:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:52:37PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote: > Hi, > > As of now, objtool only supports the x86_64 architecture but the > groundwork has already been done in order to add support for other > architecture without too much effort. Hi Raphael, This was a pleasant surprise in my inbox. From a quick glance I'm actually surprised at how "easy" it looks, though I can tell it was quite a big effort. Doing the first arch port is always the hardest. Kudos! I will give it a proper review soon. -- Josh