Return-Path: thread-index: AcQVo/V+CPPbwBn5RFORV0QmHCjaPA== Envelope-to: paul@sumlocktest.fsnet.co.uk Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:58:36 +0000 Message-ID: <003301c415a3$f57e8aa0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:39:01 +0100 From: "Patrick Gefre" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6 References: <20031228143603.A20391@infradead.org> <20031230212450.A9765@infradead.org> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: <20031230212450.A9765@infradead.org> Importance: normal Priority: normal Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2004 15:39:02.0328 (UTC) FILETIME=[F5F0FB80:01C415A3] Christoph Hellwig wrote: >On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:21:13PM -0600, Pat Gefre wrote: > > >>I'll drop 071. So I can assume that if I get rid of the renaming in 075 >>you are OK with that ? >> >> > >Yes. I don't like some of the stuff it doesn, but it's defintily not >a showstopper. > > OK - I updated the patches as Christoph suggested (removed hwgraph_path_lookup() from 000, removed snia64_pci_find_bios() from 014, removed pcibr_businfo_get() from 030 and dropped 071). I took the reorg patch (075) out for now - I am reworking it along with our next set of patches. So I think they are ready to go ? The patchset is at: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/ -- Pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/