Return-Path: thread-index: AcQVpHw8YjE2igfdSF2mGgMmDeB9aw== Envelope-to: paul@sumlocktest.fsnet.co.uk Delivery-date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 14:14:43 +0000 Message-ID: <01fa01c415a4$7c3f4e80$d100000a@sbs2003.local> X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:42:47 +0100 From: "Mikael Pettersson" To: Subject: Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6 Cc: , Sender: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2004 15:42:47.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C440970:01C415A4] On Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:33:58 +0100, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > IOW, don't lie to the compiler and pretend P-M == P4 > > with that -march=pentium4. > > What do you recommend to use as march then? There is > no pentiumm subarch support in gcc yet; I was convinced > p4 was the closest match. march=pentium3 is the closest safe choice, at least until gcc implements P-M specific support. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/