Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4070091yba; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:28:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJ4R61bQqmew9eGvtqZUckPpx6KjapmzlrIPLQ/xCM8Vt9vakxx6fggSNbrooDt5T7kNdU X-Received: by 2002:a62:305:: with SMTP id 5mr37746159pfd.65.1554830894838; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 10:28:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554830894; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bNxjtu9Wg51q+PrirR8+MBOly3yPWtkpd6gKvzIbpCqNwBbbxJ56gszIOLKLwVLyo+ CiUbcDUAo2zVz8p2rnYPNOWUIgOoLHdrOCFPg7o/x2RZUZcVowUXEblEY+jra/3iGRTu tX7R0qP0D+D5EcibAVpKw1bHP0gTngtqTMTCbglXcf6DHYA6GVsAh53UThsNr14ImGN+ 07NiJTBKm2oOqm3PFK8IZ9WFjM26Woujt2UcnQyfERIjMrxJiN7ZwlMoaJAw5xukFBRT mJGF1Wii6HzMSYjonhnBJiSQtcOagK/+xIa0Sohw+L4JpxW0CT0+MhPnHJEbY1qXKZgg Zv3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=eRzFiq0WlUDyv7JpW3tZurKqC25wrCCaUQ+Bo5ywhig=; b=KvkSUtO1I2hlHsXPYNRMfC8r3GM5M0B0jDvb+ocxbG8ZiVgv/jQdj6dF1/cIT/E2ov K/C2WZt1xRIsqh2mpdsRjdGEMPGxVi3BdSC/xCd+qeCbt5jNHudJGA3hMN2bGz7/r9ZE VK7ql9Ymd/3l9I/7SST+VsRaa0SpaBEmor8tUH4HK1utnV/JESIyvZnTtgA0qneflX4d SKdQNhErsX5bahkJzOhK6lxpg0tes1wkaEJ2jGoZ/RRcEqiLsCiDpmeAXODaxDCMtytC wGwarhsE+yx0crHh2zaRZGwgvnJBHiT7BvefjBxbMfPa/Yl3GvAmfPtt4qpqWE94Gj1J 7+mw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y15si29628050plp.357.2019.04.09.10.27.58; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 10:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727122AbfDIRZf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:25:35 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51855 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727104AbfDIRZd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:25:33 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D799268B02; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:25:20 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robin Murphy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joerg Roedel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tom Lendacky , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] dma-iommu: refactor iommu_dma_mmap Message-ID: <20190409172520.GE14679@lst.de> References: <20190327080448.5500-1-hch@lst.de> <20190327080448.5500-9-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:29:07PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 27/03/2019 08:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Move the vm_area handling into __iommu_dma_mmap, which is renamed >> to iommu_dma_mmap_remap. >> >> Inline __iommu_dma_mmap_pfn into the main function to simplify the code >> flow a bit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig >> --- >> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c >> index d14fe9f8c692..43bd3c7e0f6b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c >> @@ -597,23 +597,27 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, >> } >> /** >> - * __iommu_dma_mmap - Map a buffer into provided user VMA >> - * @pages: Array representing buffer from __iommu_dma_alloc() >> + * iommu_dma_mmap_remap - Map a remapped page array into provided user VMA >> + * @cpu_addr: virtual address of the memory to be remapped >> * @size: Size of buffer in bytes >> * @vma: VMA describing requested userspace mapping >> * >> - * Maps the pages of the buffer in @pages into @vma. The caller is responsible >> + * Maps the pages pointed to by @cpu_addr into @vma. The caller is responsible >> * for verifying the correct size and protection of @vma beforehand. >> */ >> -static int __iommu_dma_mmap(struct page **pages, size_t size, >> +static int iommu_dma_mmap_remap(void *cpu_addr, size_t size, >> struct vm_area_struct *vma) >> { >> + struct vm_struct *area = find_vm_area(cpu_addr); >> unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start; >> unsigned int i, count = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> int ret = -ENXIO; >> + if (WARN_ON(!area || !area->pages)) >> + return -ENXIO; >> + >> for (i = vma->vm_pgoff; i < count && uaddr < vma->vm_end; i++) { >> - ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, pages[i]); >> + ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, area->pages[i]); >> if (ret) >> break; >> uaddr += PAGE_SIZE; >> @@ -1052,21 +1056,13 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr, >> } >> } >> -static int __iommu_dma_mmap_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> - unsigned long pfn, size_t size) >> -{ >> - return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn + vma->vm_pgoff, >> - vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, >> - vma->vm_page_prot); >> -} >> - >> static int iommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size, >> unsigned long attrs) >> { >> unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff; >> - struct vm_struct *area; >> + unsigned long pfn; >> int ret; >> vma->vm_page_prot = arch_dma_mmap_pgprot(dev, vma->vm_page_prot, >> attrs); >> @@ -1077,25 +1073,15 @@ static int iommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> if (off >= nr_pages || vma_pages(vma) > nr_pages - off) >> return -ENXIO; >> - if (!is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) { >> - unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(cpu_addr)); >> - return __iommu_dma_mmap_pfn(vma, pfn, size); >> - } >> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) { >> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS)) >> + return iommu_dma_mmap_remap(cpu_addr, size, vma); >> + pfn = vmalloc_to_pfn(cpu_addr); >> + } else >> + pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(cpu_addr)); > > Nit: braces around the else clause for correct style. So I generally prefer that style too. But in this case one of the later patches will add an ifdef around the if { ... } else, and adding braces would make that a lot more awkware. There is another occurance or two of this patter in this series elsewhere as well.