Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:25:32 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] slob: Respect list_head abstraction layer
Message-Id: <20190409152532.7f3a8168de2ec49aec152bd6@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190409200649.GD19840@eros.localdomain>
References: <20190402230545.2929-1-tobin@kernel.org>
        <20190402230545.2929-3-tobin@kernel.org>
        <20190403180026.GC6778@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
        <20190403211354.GC23288@eros.localdomain>
        <63e395fc-41c5-00bf-0767-a313554f7b23@suse.cz>
        <20190409200649.GD19840@eros.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:06:49 +1000 "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:59:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 4/3/19 11:13 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > 
> > > According to 0day test robot this is triggering an error from
> > > CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION when the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST.
> > 
> > FWIW, that report [1] was for commit 15c8410c67adef from next-20190401. I've
> > checked and it's still the v4 version, although the report came after you
> > submitted v5 (it wasn't testing the patches from mailing list, but mmotm). I
> > don't see any report for the v5 version so I'd expect it to be indeed fixed by
> > the new approach that adds boolean return parameter to slob_page_alloc().
> > 
> > Vlastimil
> 
> Oh man thanks!  That is super cool, thanks for letting me know
> Vlastimil.

Yes, thanks for the followup.