Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4594996yba; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:21:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyWYnHmTb5S12QD+mNXrTcNkEjMUZRqrfCJAeg/evhVJf3IGFBZZmZh3UVqKPrgitmjGGAm X-Received: by 2002:a62:6a81:: with SMTP id f123mr41480105pfc.40.1554880864989; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:21:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554880864; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QK4PCXFfRtks4YALRNfQ2KDaetP746heaiSVpXRHrtvUFm+O8cdfWF0jjCdAou2eWb /QZVVj+s2J2E13mspWob3PaHSBGuc9QBZNWpl+AW/sCqx7JSbVjFS/ycuPibE4WpYg36 1440iDOqqZQIq2xb8GcbIYsSj8U26zB4ueZKOsahFMLmHSM/BTWyKWZ3CtjkA8C5glaf uUbne9beqcclpNQqCuQQ2izOYIB7OaqEAdMYH1/8xNJgmKLClKbkmdyV/tTr4asJlG0N bn5r+sXQx10G/E+VTYHOFikeHXL21ZMqs/SJ7truwzXfJiUzqNm028rhqO+ccHAKmEoy l19w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=rmMDhL7r3scJSdYXt4VYgbOoqXnNnP5oEXQavWWJBJg=; b=CMi2yZOZqBG5BF9+FCQqNfAzhlx49CBeZE2yhklNH+Tjv54Q/01gO36V58MgQiS4rp I0RgsP3FLenjJAnv4yDBMa/2TCJzv74/rNgIC9Ctq2kdY8Ga7aFFAHTKiyUBdOzqog/2 aylgn96iQC8HxE9TX3O69k2LLurhIswQKtfaOkUOzyRPb3H5wl3Q2Zd5AW185Pys5eV0 GVTdlEnPToPdbYwdy3eO8V0uyM/K9T6+Nitaxkhvn51Ky4TZNXGEzvjr3bK8i8JO9P0p yO+81vjtmXVWznzPKvWGAhl3wX4/zCOd5xwALJELiUKjarqIFCMrJLoHz+eZd8fKhvU5 doYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eKWMXOQZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z23si31900768plo.40.2019.04.10.00.20.48; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eKWMXOQZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728826AbfDJHJT (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:09:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:38176 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725909AbfDJHJT (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:09:19 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id w15so1302703wmc.3 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:09:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rmMDhL7r3scJSdYXt4VYgbOoqXnNnP5oEXQavWWJBJg=; b=eKWMXOQZ19nAjBnGVrqRsm3NI7CyC60pLIl+iZm5ImplTuNblxkkoRZTsBzj92VKNi bVYnWYYHYlMkTKfQQXaQB5beQmLamUVSmqR+soSNCsAklnUZzMmY1j+YIWYurlg9KuFe lVJuFjkflfsHNizmSmZQy0n2ClMtKWByRYGMUOverKT8BXHBEOYmQG4G7fcIYUL0JGtf EpqncWMb37xf10yx358iUt5Fgvan10uZE4lSHlBFJ8KL2zqEGuOei/fnQLmplHmM5eNt YY4H9usBNPYrCL1soealdiyFDq3bBjGn6+kSIVQP10uKfbKKZKh3C3FAWLFNW5/J0JWe 1tQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rmMDhL7r3scJSdYXt4VYgbOoqXnNnP5oEXQavWWJBJg=; b=aNod8j180p+hH0xTIp9Q7/GZOwkhPlk+D1cRjMd0krGnxz/4tuhszJFitoe5OmBaDr ZNuGlggwl2QhQ+CNrKelb8tj3f5L3shFZkiGRh6WWIt0ManjTEtCOXcIXfnjiSPRzV/w Fa+V9ihv3XR01wV+PQFqc4jT5qp39XB2lhEsuZystIMQGIg+dL15K2BzkNRd+4rAOSxo LzMiAUKlqNOWiwoptb81yKxwMd7llX/+HscXelenAI1JVXZ7BAdVUf6ikLn7V/fa8RpT PoJVng++yJ4NjOwI3gr9PRmwd8Kul54avkrMTrTeGUlTPNsG0dyM9DzbyH03nf0cURmh xpLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUkVJge4aTRMTGgsKzzmd1VrNioUmAPDCNb5KU+ftTkB441xuXW sa8tmth5HjsEZuPy6fZ0/jo= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c5ce:: with SMTP id n14mr1665337wmk.18.1554880157596; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm36823698wrx.57.2019.04.10.00.09.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:09:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Chen Zhou Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, horms@verge.net.au, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c Message-ID: <20190410070914.GA10935@gmail.com> References: <20190409102819.121335-1-chenzhou10@huawei.com> <20190409102819.121335-2-chenzhou10@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190409102819.121335-2-chenzhou10@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Chen Zhou wrote: > In preparation for supporting more than one crash kernel regions > in arm64 as x86_64 does, move reserve_crashkernel_low() into > kexec/kexec_core.c. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 3 ++ > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 66 +++++--------------------------------------- > include/linux/kexec.h | 1 + > kernel/kexec_core.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) No objections for this to be merged via the ARM tree, as long as x86 functionality is kept intact. Thanks, Ingo