Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:26:24 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Suspend development list <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] [PATCH 2.6]: suspend to disk only available if non-modular IDE
Message-ID: <20040401072623.GA224@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <200403282136.55435.arekm@pld-linux.org> <1080517040.2223.3.camel@laptop-linux.wpcb.org.au> <20040330201123.GE3084@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <1080772560.3081.0.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1080772560.3081.0.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 825
Lines: 25

Hi!

> > > Applied to 2.4 and 2.6.
> > 
> > Bad idea. For swsusp2 the patch is bad because it can resume from 
> > after initrd (IIRC). For swsusp1 patch is bad
> > because it should be able to resume
> > from usb mass storage drive.
> 
> So long as the initrd doesn't mess our filesystems up, we should be
> okay, shouldn't we?

As long as we test it once a while, yes.

But if resume from initrd works there's no reason to disallow modular
IDE... and that was what patch did.
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/