Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5118102yba; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:43:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyl6m0l7VZVq3tuOofOMuL6Xk0CXbQ1uZ8Mdr0RQ8SMNY3liNzCFO3tscdeg0UtA7aULbhw X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8252:: with SMTP id e18mr44629366pfn.105.1554921833301; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:43:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554921833; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RJMtfxXbdDNAiSc02mwHcj21qytXDQCsHKGTHWpWr4JucN6aXHPwSlj+UppF6IL1Nh IjHlTkR0RbBD2VzqrxKSH9V1lp+IbnOzehjTFkclSpEXiH5A//XwEo6jrtJ3FzTOTFox IiYGfjysZiQAqunQbHbCVioYM9/zxcdYzfcPn+mh3R1ETpdxX079MEGUk+h0DpRvBzvy hn09ESu/AUEIQb4wqDOJi82lqzH4/d5+DikmPwVIMt+HzDrUc04p1aj+cRF+QTYkMQd4 wLhTGaUg4vaoq+Um8Q8t1QThuu0MbDeHC+WQLa2B7Hfmb+BvRXa+hxXAnIkNQq+Z4m7O V1gQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=ksnxsBn0Gei9CAy2US0LW5KJ2kCHavE93htCCIalMHg=; b=YWJTesv4/sX7HJKXuYntCO4h9etsSbQ+5LmNvEi01OTyJNSGIylZqEzB0bhwZOCHGy tsY+8sSG2JKj06p3XC20ToUk1PARv7gbrUalj06eEBEo3cy1fui4ivLxFH9LAa7gffr3 yrcdegUrTdbPktFaBp+gOV2HGHHb4rxlMNZFa1OJcgwpXx6umffWaeJMdntWjLlg8KwE VT0zdqne2oNbmJej5BGM27+8n8jB6yZQ8xrIxpeDif2PUQNvnhHd1unLtlyHcnE2rkVI ejlshTxok9bx6AxgTPs9i/FEWvK8dTCWMip7q2dBq4cfLtiwEiCl3nWu0ZWsM3+z97Dv 0pMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d34si3321507pla.224.2019.04.10.11.43.36; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387678AbfDJQKQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:10:16 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57374 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730598AbfDJQKP (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:10:15 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F76374; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01E093F59C; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:10:11 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Aditya Pakki Cc: kjlu@umn.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix to replace of_match_device Message-ID: <20190410161011.GE3952@e107155-lin> References: <20190322215503.13434-1-pakki001@umn.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190322215503.13434-1-pakki001@umn.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:55:03PM -0500, Aditya Pakki wrote: > of_match_device can return NULL if no matching device is found. > This patch replaces the function with of_device_get_match_data. > and returns -EINVAL in such a scenario. > > Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki > > --- > v1: Replace of_match_device with of_device_get_match_data > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > index 8f952f2f1a29..a44852a1d5bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > @@ -798,7 +798,9 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - desc = of_match_device(scmi_of_match, dev)->data; probe won't be called be there's no match. And we mandate data in the driver, so this should never happen. > + desc = of_device_get_match_data(dev); Having said that, I am happy to use the above function. > + if (!desc) > + return -EINVAL; > NULL check seems totally unnecessary, but it's in probe so I am fine. Applied with updates to subject and commit message. -- Regards, Sudeep