Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5246315yba; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuT9TE/2+R0v2n9JT/CMiWY2tYGDDhj2U0BcFIXdb3a/JVEZ5dWEDzh8OGQPiTHQujfJ+D X-Received: by 2002:a62:b602:: with SMTP id j2mr46551683pff.68.1554933371164; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554933371; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XFduPr6PJxs0f2R1AoLuD24UqrrkvR109xR1PA2zuUz8VJUhnQoriSQPxQEV9E4Wp+ 0J+ws3HV8Z6WyhlgIRmEQmY3b7UfGOc5YxKtLLAQVRjEhdQ6KSmNJATktnPaOFsppAji zw1qejF4886uWJjB5cujdtx5bWeh9s1CuOVb2t/985pWFH/fckUKqDyNKl1Nf+snzmXx kZpgddXrIPgE4HrOKIJBqz0zjOmpbzfki8LkCZ1eQayXlc3WgoKQ18GIH6XCqfSx+U/6 dIlGW7Hwrq9aml3nEAZgZD3/Vw4uV4C82QOBaVGoVE4TLxNjHhUUMtfTpUqWhxwmLJVD xteA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=ZrHhVa9RN72oSeqnNzwv+oRHbdHY5x8FFaBvV2Vqf6Q=; b=t6NJzz8PxHCJeu3aHtErjWs/K8k4kujDUwJl95Xg6ALDBRsS8dqf+SaM7bZ0oKymds haUzsNJgHzKvylbruzAUl6wN3qCihjepRezODkC7I7fmDMZlfy4QV+nwMIV25DkzgQJm Fu6ikpIEJcBTgGlCGWhjET806K7dNh/HbEHAYx4f7q5N8OXy3uFddAY28Osh6E7wVmo2 UlWPsGinsN5YgzGJ355R/w1nkc+l1dmL+420S95lcyaYLKYkwS3BeZXPI+ErHYp1QC/R lIiTZdXJRsYAj+dEAyICuRBH25FrmnaudahJC8xOmbwTLYoieu7RcIgYM0srbRnav/nu QuIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r7si34719040ple.70.2019.04.10.14.55.55; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726716AbfDJVxl (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:53:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39756 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726096AbfDJVxk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:53:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D7AF3FB2; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t460p.redhat.com (ovpn-118-18.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.118.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797105D704; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:53:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Scott Wood To: Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Cc: linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wu Hao , Scott Wood Subject: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: Add lockdep classes for pdata->lock Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:53:39 -0500 Message-Id: <20190410215339.8074-1-swood@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org struct dfl_feature_platform_data (and it's mutex) is used by both fme and port devices, and when lockdep is enabled it complains about nesting between these locks. Tell lockdep about the difference so it can track each class separately. Here's the lockdep complaint: [ 409.680668] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 409.685983] 5.1.0-rc3.fpga+ #1 Tainted: G E [ 409.691469] -------------------------------------------- [ 409.696779] fpgaconf/9348 is trying to acquire lock: [ 409.701746] 00000000a443fe2e (&pdata->lock){+.+.}, at: port_enable_set+0x24/0x60 [dfl_afu] [ 409.710006] [ 409.710006] but task is already holding lock: [ 409.715837] 0000000063b78782 (&pdata->lock){+.+.}, at: fme_pr_ioctl+0x21d/0x330 [dfl_fme] [ 409.724012] [ 409.724012] other info that might help us debug this: [ 409.730535] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 409.730535] [ 409.736457] CPU0 [ 409.738910] ---- [ 409.741360] lock(&pdata->lock); [ 409.744679] lock(&pdata->lock); [ 409.747999] [ 409.747999] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 409.747999] [ 409.753920] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 409.753920] [ 409.760704] 4 locks held by fpgaconf/9348: [ 409.764805] #0: 0000000063b78782 (&pdata->lock){+.+.}, at: fme_pr_ioctl+0x21d/0x330 [dfl_fme] [ 409.773408] #1: 00000000213c8a66 (®ion->mutex){+.+.}, at: fpga_region_program_fpga+0x24/0x200 [fpga_region] [ 409.783489] #2: 00000000fe63afb9 (&mgr->ref_mutex){+.+.}, at: fpga_mgr_lock+0x15/0x40 [fpga_mgr] [ 409.792354] #3: 000000000b2285c5 (&bridge->mutex){+.+.}, at: __fpga_bridge_get+0x26/0xa0 [fpga_bridge] [ 409.801740] [ 409.801740] stack backtrace: [ 409.806102] CPU: 45 PID: 9348 Comm: fpgaconf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.1.0-rc3.fpga+ #1 [ 409.815658] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BT/S2600BT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.00.0763.022420181017 02/24/2018 [ 409.825911] Call Trace: [ 409.828369] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8b [ 409.831686] __lock_acquire+0xf3d/0x10e0 [ 409.835612] ? find_held_lock+0x3c/0xa0 [ 409.839451] lock_acquire+0xbc/0x1d0 [ 409.843030] ? port_enable_set+0x24/0x60 [dfl_afu] [ 409.847823] ? port_enable_set+0x24/0x60 [dfl_afu] [ 409.852616] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 409.856195] ? port_enable_set+0x24/0x60 [dfl_afu] [ 409.860989] ? port_enable_set+0x24/0x60 [dfl_afu] [ 409.865777] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x4b/0x290 [ 409.870486] port_enable_set+0x24/0x60 [dfl_afu] [ 409.875106] fpga_bridges_disable+0x36/0x50 [fpga_bridge] [ 409.880502] fpga_region_program_fpga+0xea/0x200 [fpga_region] [ 409.886338] fme_pr_ioctl+0x13e/0x330 [dfl_fme] [ 409.890870] fme_ioctl+0x66/0xe0 [dfl_fme] [ 409.894973] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x720 [ 409.898548] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xf0/0x1a0 [ 409.902907] ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90 [ 409.906225] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 409.909981] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x220 [ 409.913644] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 409.918698] RIP: 0033:0x7f9d31b9b8d7 [ 409.922276] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 05 b9 15 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 89 15 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 409.941020] RSP: 002b:00007ffe4cae0d68 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 409.948588] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9d32ade6a0 RCX: 00007f9d31b9b8d7 [ 409.955719] RDX: 00007ffe4cae0df0 RSI: 000000000000b680 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 409.962852] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 00007f9d2b70a177 R09: 00007ffe4cae0e40 [ 409.969984] R10: 00007ffe4cae0160 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffe4cae0df0 [ 409.977115] R13: 000000000000b680 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffe4cae0f60 Signed-off-by: Scott Wood --- drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c index 2c09e502e721..56dd39dcdcdf 100644 --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c @@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ enum dfl_fpga_devt_type { DFL_FPGA_DEVT_MAX, }; +static struct lock_class_key dfl_pdata_keys[DFL_ID_MAX]; + +static const char *dfl_pdata_key_strings[DFL_ID_MAX] = { + "dfl-fme-pdata", + "dfl-port-pdata", +}; + /** * dfl_dev_info - dfl feature device information. * @name: name string of the feature platform device. @@ -443,11 +450,16 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo) struct platform_device *fdev = binfo->feature_dev; struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata; struct dfl_feature_info *finfo, *p; + static enum dfl_id_type type; int ret, index = 0; if (!fdev) return 0; + type = feature_dev_id_type(fdev); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(type >= DFL_ID_MAX)) + return -EINVAL; + /* * we do not need to care for the memory which is associated with * the platform device. After calling platform_device_unregister(), @@ -463,6 +475,8 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo) pdata->num = binfo->feature_num; pdata->dfl_cdev = binfo->cdev; mutex_init(&pdata->lock); + lockdep_set_class_and_name(&pdata->lock, &dfl_pdata_keys[type], + dfl_pdata_key_strings[type]); /* * the count should be initialized to 0 to make sure @@ -497,7 +511,7 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo) ret = platform_device_add(binfo->feature_dev); if (!ret) { - if (feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev) == PORT_ID) + if (type == PORT_ID) dfl_fpga_cdev_add_port_dev(binfo->cdev, binfo->feature_dev); else -- 1.8.3.1