Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:12:31 -0700
From:   Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/14] x86/watchdog/hardlockup/hpet: Determine if
 HPET timer caused NMI
Message-ID: <20190411011231.GA9936@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
References: <1551283518-18922-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
 <1551283518-18922-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
 <20190409112817.GT4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20190410011957.GC10062@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
 <20190410070152.GV11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190410070152.GV11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:01:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:19:57PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:28:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > @@ -147,6 +161,14 @@ static void set_periodic(struct hpet_hld_data *hdata)
> > > >   */
> > > >  static bool is_hpet_wdt_interrupt(struct hpet_hld_data *hdata)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	if (smp_processor_id() == hdata->handling_cpu) {
> > > > +		unsigned long tsc_curr;
> > > 
> > > TSC is u64
> > 
> > In x86_64, isn't u64 an unsigned long? Do you mean to consider the
> > 32-bit case?
> 
> Unless none of this code is available for x86_32, you pretty much have
> to consider 32bit.
> 
> But even then, using u64 for 64bit values is the right thing.

OK, I'll implement this change.

Thanks and BR,
Ricardo