Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262953AbUDAQVX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:21:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262954AbUDAQU3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:20:29 -0500 Received: from a34-mta01.direcpc.com ([66.82.4.90]:6604 "EHLO a34-mta01.direcway.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262956AbUDAQUD (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:20:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:19:53 -0600 From: Matt Gulick Subject: Re: TI Firewire controller ? In-reply-to: <200403312354.17104.gene.heskett@verizon.net> To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Cc: linux-kernel mailing list Reply-to: gulickconsulting@direcway.com Message-id: <1080836393.5300.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Gulick Consulting MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200403312354.17104.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2064 Lines: 50 On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 22:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings; > > I bought, 3 or so years back, a 1394 controller, thinking > that maybe it had a chance to become a standard, like USB > is now. > > lspci -vv reports this: > 00:0b.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments FireWire Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) > Subsystem: Texas Instruments: Unknown device 8010 > Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- > Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Latency: 32 (750ns min, 1000ns max), cache line size 08 > Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 > Region 0: Memory at e3007000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K] > Region 1: Memory at e3000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] > Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 1 > Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-) > Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- > > Is there any chance that this card can actually be used with modern devices? > Or should I bin it and save the couple of watts its burning? There should probably be a mail list for 1394 (and USB for that matter) as this is the kernel mail list. I will respond to your query though. If the information is correct and the card is OHCI (not the same as USB OHCI), then it should work just fine. OHCI is a standard interface to the 1394 link chip. If you plug that card into a Mac or Windose box, it would be recognized as such and the drivers loaded. The same holds true for Linux. Matt ---------------------------------------- Matt Gulick Sr. Staff Engineer Adaptec, Inc. gulickconsulting@direcway.com matt_gulick@adaptec.com (715) 426-0884 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/