Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5576166yba; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:45:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyudyYdvOKL1ovftyyTRK2Upk/GWqWxvnLvpz0pVCx6guWVwnQpNYPuHwYehizkzQKC6VF2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a704:: with SMTP id w4mr46839241plq.51.1554968747679; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:45:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554968747; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cp24SWi8zz8yokoAcgKI/WnBIgH1gXHqrGqAoE8p48Mk29AakWIG29F+LzDK1sMCcn vZ/lp82/O0ruDAUf9UqiGMNghMtms8eap3vLLJtc3Tq5MVxpyyK3sc3oVRVcT2u6Vwl3 fBLBZXpkJLzzUPL4NIOEXWID7gnt9NKmogmoGVzzplxzBEgknvuAspMRmzN5veSpAGSU CUZrH69qR9UvnISx0r+M4E+pu6yoYpRksbXPqmaZ1rj65HaxfvFhVryVJrOkhzds1sC8 kRAStZ9F8EfaB6UUDWqXhK3ughZef34Xqz27ntDXEy39tLCvCNxD9FMmDM2YTppfLqrh IlJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=NWiDdlAPtDBFXw5c9TftipX3YO+WnyayMk0a8D2/aJE=; b=G7goNPPINB9lHr3M0WbdvbRBDmRM8/r4w4MiyTayDrYlR+hznlNUwSp/vpSjghUJ7u RPQwjYL5yPRiK/+CqsIW7mADdwkEEPP1gIpgDfkNTB8IfZQ9oNHhDp5z/pTi2ac/gZoo tpIPRRCe7aKOmJZwk1BgeE9M7o76LN73kACO8dl6J1mfZYG83paDZTxh5awHHGqGucOW 1WaAIguvgA/GbHJBw33XBv78E9kIKHIAmVL+EQ49HAjnazBQLCg7895QvW2+1TI5FC5e r9tmByVOnjL3oY22pbyuh934iHD9L2rDPCQWykbI8xpSk8F34gstAi0NB7JDND7dNVLr Yh/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y3si24911965plt.57.2019.04.11.00.45.31; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726927AbfDKHnn (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 03:43:43 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:47714 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726104AbfDKHnm (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 03:43:42 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3B7hSxM073026 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 03:43:40 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rt0ynhkp0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 03:43:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:41:00 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:40:58 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x3B7eue857671698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:40:56 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FBDAE053; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:40:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424DDAE051; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:40:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mschwideX1 (unknown [9.145.74.176]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:40:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:40:55 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Harald Freudenberger , Heiko Carstens , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , Nathan Chancellor , linux-s390 , Ingo Franzki , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390: zcrypt: initialize variables before_use In-Reply-To: References: <20190408212648.2407234-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190408212648.2407234-5-arnd@arndb.de> <8875e0b6-00b4-884d-fd6a-a5a144543559@linux.ibm.com> <20190410175946.0e6d2b00@mschwideX1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19041107-0020-0000-0000-0000032E9E70 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19041107-0021-0000-0000-00002180CD0C Message-Id: <20190411094055.5884244c@mschwideX1> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-04-11_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=897 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904110055 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:57:21 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Martin Schwidefsky > wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:54:30 +0200 Harald Freudenberger wrote: > > > On 08.04.19 23:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > } > > > Thanks Arnd, but as Nathan already wrote, I'd prefer to have the > > > variable initialized with 0 instead of -1. > > > If you agree with this, I'll rewrite the patch and apply it to our > > > internal git and it will appear at kernel org with the next s390 code merge then. > > > > Do we agreement on func_coed=0 for this one ? > > Yes, I think that was the consensus. > > Arnd > Ok, committed with func_code=0. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.