From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: disable-cap-mlock
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:11:15 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
       William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
References: <20040401135920.GF18585@dualathlon.random> <20040401164825.GD791@holomorphy.com> <20040401165952.GM18585@dualathlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20040401165952.GM18585@dualathlon.random>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200404011911.15953@WOLK>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 679
Lines: 21

On Thursday 01 April 2004 18:59, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

Hi Andrea, Bill,

> > Something like this would have the minor advantage of zero core impact.
> > Testbooted only. vs. 2.6.5-rc3-mm4

Cool!

> I certainly like this too (despite it's more complicated but it might
> avoid us to have to add further sysctl in the future), Andrew what do
> you prefer to merge? I don't mind either ways.

I'd vote for caps via sysctl.

ciao, Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/