Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:12:22 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
        Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update remaining @linux.vnet.ibm.com
 addresses
Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com
References: <20190411042752.22039-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
 <0702bc9a10703d53a46f27468b2c9ef2463e1c0b.camel@perches.com>
 <87k1g0vj7f.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
 <921408ed6a19d9c6fed18182f03a6dac5ea42aae.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <921408ed6a19d9c6fed18182f03a6dac5ea42aae.camel@perches.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Message-Id: <20190411131222.GW14111@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:27:31AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 22:07 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> writes:
> > > On Thu, 2019-04-11 at 06:27 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > > Paul McKenney attempted to update all email addresses @linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > > > to @linux.ibm.com in commit 1dfddcdb95c4
> > > > ("MAINTAINERS: Update from @linux.vnet.ibm.com to @linux.ibm.com"), but
> > > > some still remained.
> > > > 
> > > > We update the remaining email addresses in MAINTAINERS, hopefully finally
> > > > catching all cases for good.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps update all the similar addresses in other files too
> > > 
> > > $ git grep --name-only 'linux\.vnet\.ibm\.com' | wc -l
> > > 315
> > 
> > A good number of them are no longer valid. So I'm not sure it's worth
> > updating them en masse to addresses that won't ever work.
> > 
> > We have git now, we don't need email addresses in files, they're just
> > prone to bitrot like this.
> > 
> > Should we just change them all like so?
> > 
> >   -arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts: * Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >   +arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts: * Josh Boyer (IBM)
> > 
> > To indicate the author was at IBM when they wrote it?
> 
> If that's desired, perhaps:
> 
> $ git grep -P --name-only '<?[\w\.]+(?:@| at )linux\.vnet\.ibm\.com>?' | \
>   grep -vP '\.mailmap|MAINTAINERS' | \
>   xargs perl -p -i -e 's/<?[\w\.]+(?:@|\ at\ )linux\.vnet\.ibm\.com>?/(IBM)/g'
> 
> > Or should we try and update them with current addresses? Though then the
> > authors might start getting mails they don't want.
> 
> That'd be my preference.
> 
> If authors get emails they don't want, then those contact
> emails should be removed.

I have updated most of mine, with one more installment of patches to go
into the next merge window and another into the merge window after that.
More churn than I would have expected, though.  If my email address were
to change again, I would instead go with the "(IBM)" approach and let
the git log and MAINTAINERS file keep the contact information.  Not that
we get to update the git log, of course.  ;-)

I might not have bothered except for combining with the SPDX-tag
commits.

							Thanx, Paul