Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp5856753yba; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxgvIOG21HRz0KtEiEZGDW6RMSJrs6qeuIvyvDDFL4oTDj+BbJ+f6UakK2mj1iTnlFEM0+ X-Received: by 2002:a63:3185:: with SMTP id x127mr1152443pgx.299.1554991967409; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554991967; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nXOa4BfPX5+t6hNdwlT7h/i78f/7xU0RDSuhUgaxFBvHwBJMSrvpeRagQ6qW1axOw4 z7QrGFvrepAso9af3eZJzaUy3aLjkMekzvaVsaPCRdKNLTaLGdX95wJMYTa4L5XejgVy ce+jAXfOslIrEuAE0rajirIhvdbmk5JKCx31Coe0zRWYWDUEC5Owjlg/jGVBmy/7vPrL hn1Sr8/cct03J1o1HDArQm8MgGt+360VyXTUqkZV6hSbU3fPuYXosIlroa+mpcSWYpG4 6QidKLSUd+n8MSC33rXrLQ5h9rJWaOrMtb97+AEkNlCeSstVROUCLNc51rQ3Otf1I5yH xx7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=0XV8R0er+23osjgoTSrIDQGArI8iuUD6U8g7/SArr/A=; b=CxRzdJDA7rUQKGsFxwEVMcdNohCtDeB4QewnE8UWb0wMm5fYVJFG2ocpHbCeJoYl6j WIkqjcHwzJrIxLLO6rDQwtdgN+DB/8ZxibzwXeE0/z6ToN97j9M8mXHLcaunTS9sq/AS Wm5sv/vvpCBBd+hcqn6diYVUZrblvmRcNa+YhO8ApZFRShbL5SkZ6xcY44gVnE4GsEOM MwcN26uu35fxGgSnEpu3mZgog9IRIHDeGhIMWGGL8eP6GXBbEZjZ8mB4PHqhMrMiPBgw 6qcQy5luQbQzcaoe8OBC0e53LCRpT36PcDWQTgRMRxQjiv4VFTRTMB5+w4hNPpxmGTMG QaGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o2si34301953pll.388.2019.04.11.07.12.30; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726656AbfDKOKc (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:10:32 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43816 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726121AbfDKOKc (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:10:32 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D422980D; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.37.12.69] (unknown [10.37.12.69]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4690D3F68F; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64/fpsimd: Don't disable softirq when touching FPSIMD/SVE state To: Dave Martin Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190208165513.8435-1-julien.grall@arm.com> <20190404105233.GD3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <0f8d6b53-6834-7363-03fc-6fd47ea49b80@arm.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:10:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190404105233.GD3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On 4/4/19 11:52 AM, Dave Martin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:55:13PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > I'm not sure how this patch will affect context switch overhead, so it > would be good to see hackbench numbers (or similar). I finally have some numbers for this patch. The benchmark was ran using Linux 5.1-rc4 and defconfig. On Juno2: * hackbench 100 process 1000 (10 times) * .7% quicker On ThunderX 2: * hackbench 1000 process 1000 (20 times) * 3.4% quicker I am happy to try other benchmark if you think it is useful. Anyway, I will resend the series with the comments addressed. Cheers, -- Julien Grall