Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] dt-bindings: irqchip: Introduce TISCI Interrupt
 router bindings
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
CC:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
References: <20190410041358.16809-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com>
 <20190410041358.16809-7-lokeshvutla@ti.com>
 <20190411150023.GQ2839@atomide.com>
From:   Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Message-ID: <9cd4b818-905c-08a4-5675-a5ee763cea98@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:54:24 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190411150023.GQ2839@atomide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 11/04/19 8:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> [190410 04:15]:
>> +Example:
>> +--------
>> +The following example demonstrates both interrupt router node and the consumer
>> +node(main gpio) on the AM654 SoC:
>> +
>> +main_intr: interrupt-controller0 {
>> +	compatible = "ti,sci-intr";
>> +	ti,intr-trigger-type = <1>;
>> +	interrupt-controller;
>> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
>> +	#interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +	ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>> +	ti,sci-dst-id = <56>;
>> +	ti,sci-rm-range-girq = <0x1>;
>> +};
> 
> To me it seems there should not be too many of these interrupt
> controller nodes for each SoC. Maybe you're already planning on
> doing it, but I suggest that you just add more specific compatibles
> and then look up the dst-id from a mapping table in the driver
> similar to what patch 04/12 in this series is already doing.
> 
> That way you don't need to add custom TI specific (firmware
> defined) device tree properties listed above ;)

I am tired of arguing on this. We did close this topic in the previous version
of this series. Why do you want to keep re visiting the same. Sorry, I am not
going change unless I receive a Nack from Marc or Rob.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh