Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262260AbUDAXIp (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:08:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263324AbUDAXIp (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:08:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:14475 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262260AbUDAXIn (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:08:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:08:18 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: Andrew Morton , , Subject: Re: disable-cap-mlock In-Reply-To: <20040401223619.GB18585@dualathlon.random> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1007 Lines: 24 On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Marc-Christian extracted it and he posted it on l-k some week ago, so > you can just check l-k (From: Marc-Christian) and you'll find it. It's > against 2.4 however. Problem is that it's absolutely useless for the > problem I had to solve, or I would be using it already instead. Oracle seems to be using it just fine in a certain 2.4 based kernel, so why exactly do you think it would be useless for the problem you want to solve ? Also, what would need to be fixed in order for it to not be useless ? ;) -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/