Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp607524yba; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:54:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAqhljFSiSgDfPlw51kzHpW20c8gy8dn4g7vB4dcU/AvOhQO7BbGTnCCNS5xMtLdCWXW1R X-Received: by 2002:a63:2c09:: with SMTP id s9mr50305587pgs.411.1555088098522; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:54:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555088098; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vy0dvIv9SgmhV95TbBuw9dpsGerkon49+N33AqoKvHLWAN0gl2pGArMWLuB8M++a/x DX8j/wn2qDekDdk/Gk70of8rfeVvjdxxSaGOq40IIyk6uef/8DDryH4E/Quj44j/d7oT 0VspjqYxdpT43LCPr9gB8xUxtmfot9Q+/ZS53VDMm6atSt68ephdjO2P6//xyDGvowWF WI5Wg+awNVRBwyCj9kAjIDd2j1hFQBWTlXKjrWCefO6FKWYbgkBZU5u962YzoYU1GWFE BdhIv38mZ1eOP3LAWHkqpxIqHRLdNE6v8i0f/bNTrFWjESEprRT1YLgMSDRX8FBLmKIg szxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=J8+nMcLsizTcpYafwM3rJgVhGUXw3HvEEw2X1EXjaUg=; b=U0INxhD+89xctOtJAAfdxExpm49XdtYZhC/z3Zc3fK89RXj9lBPhAwsSG/3o1XEbU8 QrbbVT+bEJKNIoa8PxsiGA8caaX2CTk3s+Z1L6L0tdNDqzjc98sKJ9EihbKqN+3IkioS 3Nj3xz+RiYNdfjW8vrwNlQE7bxLnZTl7VTGCvgJw59XkA/2maPCuD8NGmMUZqDQ4OLYs SnIoHS5Dk2U1oHIa1ZwMlm2N7PjOXdIqic+Ux3tt9kj2kzN+T3ewx0rmSS8vXx2hRNoE yiS/hwey8ecB4c7HZYaXbk9FPyDMYKVRZNHGh4VJTS3f9vRSTu2D1eMbkgTT0x1PeZws zahQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x3si18117466pgr.202.2019.04.12.09.54.42; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726832AbfDLQwr (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:52:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56536 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726624AbfDLQwq (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:52:46 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC46AE28; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:52:35 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , Naoya Horiguchi , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hugetlb: use same fault hash key for shared and private mappings Message-ID: <20190412165235.t4sscoujczfhuiyt@linux-r8p5> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Kravetz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , Naoya Horiguchi , "Kirill A . Shutemov" References: <20190328234704.27083-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> <20190328234704.27083-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> <0b1d1faf-ff72-a51f-b48a-175c9c5cab53@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b1d1faf-ff72-a51f-b48a-175c9c5cab53@oracle.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Mike Kravetz wrote: >On 3/28/19 4:47 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> hugetlb uses a fault mutex hash table to prevent page faults of the >> same pages concurrently. The key for shared and private mappings is >> different. Shared keys off address_space and file index. Private >> keys off mm and virtual address. Consider a private mappings of a >> populated hugetlbfs file. A write fault will first map the page from >> the file and then do a COW to map a writable page. > >Davidlohr suggested adding the stack trace to the commit log. When I >originally 'discovered' this issue I was debugging something else. The >routine remove_inode_hugepages() contains the following: > > * ... > * This race can only happen in the hole punch case. > * Getting here in a truncate operation is a bug. > */ > if (unlikely(page_mapped(page))) { > BUG_ON(truncate_op); > > i_mmap_lock_write(mapping); > hugetlb_vmdelete_list(&mapping->i_mmap, > index * pages_per_huge_page(h), > (index + 1) * pages_per_huge_page(h)); > i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping); > } > > lock_page(page); > /* > * We must free the huge page and remove from page > * ... > */ > VM_BUG_ON(PagePrivate(page)); > remove_huge_page(page); > freed++; > >I observed that the page could be mapped (again) before the call to lock_page >if we raced with a private write fault. However, for COW faults the faulting >code is holding the page lock until it unmaps the file page. Hence, we will >not call remove_huge_page() with the page mapped. That is good. However, for >simple read faults the page remains mapped after releasing the page lock and >we can call remove_huge_page with a mapped page and BUG. > >Sorry, the original commit message was not completely accurate in describing >the issue. I was basing the change on behavior experienced during debug of >a another issue. Actually, it is MUCH easier to BUG by making private read >faults race with hole punch. As a result, I now think this should go to >stable. > >Andrew, below is an updated commit message. No changes to code. Would you >like me to send an updated patch? Also, need to add stable. > >hugetlb uses a fault mutex hash table to prevent page faults of the >same pages concurrently. The key for shared and private mappings is >different. Shared keys off address_space and file index. Private >keys off mm and virtual address. Consider a private mappings of a >populated hugetlbfs file. A fault will map the page from the file >and if needed do a COW to map a writable page. > >Hugetlbfs hole punch uses the fault mutex to prevent mappings of file >pages. It uses the address_space file index key. However, private >mappings will use a different key and could race with this code to map >the file page. This causes problems (BUG) for the page cache remove >code as it expects the page to be unmapped. A sample stack is: > >page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_mapped(page)) >kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:169! >... >RIP: 0010:unaccount_page_cache_page+0x1b8/0x200 >... >Call Trace: >__delete_from_page_cache+0x39/0x220 >delete_from_page_cache+0x45/0x70 >remove_inode_hugepages+0x13c/0x380 >? __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x162/0x380 >hugetlbfs_fallocate+0x403/0x540 >? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30 >? __inode_security_revalidate+0x5d/0x70 >? selinux_file_permission+0x100/0x130 >vfs_fallocate+0x13f/0x270 >ksys_fallocate+0x3c/0x80 >__x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20 >do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 >entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > >There seems to be another potential COW issue/race with this approach >of different private and shared keys as noted in commit 8382d914ebf7 >("mm, hugetlb: improve page-fault scalability"). > >Since every hugetlb mapping (even anon and private) is actually a file >mapping, just use the address_space index key for all mappings. This >results in potentially more hash collisions. However, this should not >be the common case. This is fair enough as most mappings will be shared anyway (it would be lovely to have some machinery to measure collisions in kernel hash tables, in general). >Fixes: b5cec28d36f5 ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages") Ok the issue was introduced after we had the mutex table. >Cc: Thanks for the details, I'm definitely seeing the idx mismatch issue now. Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso