Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:09:43 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
cc:     Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel/time/ntp.c: Possible off-by-one error in TAI range
 check?
In-Reply-To: <CAFqZXNuqWGNwUTUxWjZRmx4PFL2zsRRo6fu+ZXZwaQAMvuf1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904151008460.1729@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <CAFqZXNsO63bX37T=bg=QRt6_EtpvXUNQ_N-TSXsN4=wd1Dz2zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFqZXNuqWGNwUTUxWjZRmx4PFL2zsRRo6fu+ZXZwaQAMvuf1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:

CC+ Miroslav

> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > while writing tests for clock adjustment auditing [1] [2], I stumbled
> > upon a strange behavior of adjtimex(2) when setting the TAI offset...
> >
> > Commit 153b5d054ac2 ("ntp: support for TAI") added a possibility to
> > change the TAI offset from userspace via adjtimex(2). The code checks
> > if the input value (txc->constant) is greater than 0 and if it is not,
> > then it doesn't modify the value. Ignoring the fact that this check
> > should probably be in timekeeping_validate_timex() and cause -EINVAL
> > to be returned when false, I find it strange that the check doesn't
> > allow to set the value to 0, which seems to be the default value...
> >
> > Was this behavior intended or should the code actually check for
> > txc->constant >= 0 instead of txc->constant > 0?
> 
> Ping?
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/10
> > [2] https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-More-detailed-auditing-of-changes-to-system-clock
> >
> > --
> > Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
> > Software Engineer, Security Technologies
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> -- 
> Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
> Software Engineer, Security Technologies
> Red Hat, Inc.
>