Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7CD7261197
Date:   Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:56:45 -0600
From:   Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc:     swboyd@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rplsssn@codeaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, dianders@chromium.org,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] support wakeup capable GPIOs
Message-ID: <20190415155645.GA16124@codeaurora.org>
References: <20190313211844.29416-1-ilina@codeaurora.org>
 <d0ef548a-6721-056b-4394-6e5658b32880@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d0ef548a-6721-056b-4394-6e5658b32880@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 15 2019 at 06:43 -0600, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>On 13/03/2019 21:18, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This series adds support for wakeup capable GPIOs. It is based on Thierry's
>> hiearchical GPIO domains. This approach is based on Stephen's idea [1]. The SoC
>> that is used for this development is a QCOM SDM845. The current patchset is
>> rebased on top of 5.0 and adds documentation for the wakeup-parent and
>> irqdomain-map DT properties along with the the optional irqdomain-map-mask and
>> irqdomain-map-pass-thru properties. Also incorporating comments from Marc on
>> the earlier submission [2]. I cleaned up some of the change history in these
>> patches to match the version number with that of the submission.
>>
>> The dtsi patches are based on Bjorn's changes for increased address and cell
>> size [3] and [4].
>>
>> Kindly review the series.
>
>What the status of this? What is the expected merge strategy?
>
Hi Mark,

I ran into a couple of issues, most of which have been sorted out. But
there is a hardware requirement to write up another register (to set
type), for GPIO wakeup that was missed earlier. I am trying to get that
tested out. That's the hold up. Sorry about that.

--Lina