Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264175AbUDBUqy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:46:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264172AbUDBUqy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:46:54 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:36559 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264175AbUDBUqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:46:40 -0500 Message-Id: <200404022046.i32KkX231280@mail.osdl.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:46:30 -0800 (PST) From: markw@osdl.org Subject: Re: 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 To: akpm@osdl.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de In-Reply-To: <20040402115601.24912093.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 594 Lines: 16 On 2 Apr, Andrew Morton wrote: > - I'm surprised that you didn't see big gains from ext3-fsync-speedup, > even though it appears that the test uses fdatasync(). Yeah, PostgreSQL defaults to fdatasync. I should have paid closer attention when you said *-fsync-speedup patches... I'll rerun using fsync. PostgreSQL will also do open_sync. Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/