Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261252AbUDBW4j (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:56:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261263AbUDBW4j (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:56:39 -0500 Received: from outmx016.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.2.115]:36298 "EHLO outmx016.isp.belgacom.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261292AbUDBW4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:56:38 -0500 Subject: elevators From: Fabian Frederick To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080946656.4484.5.camel@linux.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:57:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030212) (outmx016.isp.belgacom.be) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 520 Lines: 17 Hi, I've been testing cfq against standard elevator under 2.6.5rc3-mm4 with dbench and I've been surprised by high variations there.Someone could tell me if there are a lot of elevator patches available to compare ? PS:I'm not subscribed to lkml. Regards, Fabian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/