Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:45:54 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc:     Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
        Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/boot: Use efi_setup_data for searching RSDP on
 kexec-ed kernel
Message-ID: <20190416094554.GF27892@zn.tnic>
References: <C54C5A30-62D9-45C4-8036-88D255FD92A1@alien8.de>
 <20190411125822.GE30080@zn.tnic>
 <20190412025416.GA11070@jeru.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
 <20190412084956.GC19808@zn.tnic>
 <20190412133528.GD19808@zn.tnic>
 <cc2c1dbe-4fb3-fb7d-0540-c04734fc15cb@ce.jp.nec.com>
 <20190415090717.GA29317@zn.tnic>
 <20190415102525.GB29317@zn.tnic>
 <23309b73-d135-a207-564b-6003cee39184@ce.jp.nec.com>
 <4dbbbb4b-7af9-bd98-b567-890407a15cd1@ce.jp.nec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4dbbbb4b-7af9-bd98-b567-890407a15cd1@ce.jp.nec.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:14:34PM +0000, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> I see kexec is only supported on 64bit kernel. But are we sure
> we don't need to support kexec on EFI32 + 64bit kernel?
> 
> I don't have such an environment and as far as I tried with OVMF i386
> and KVM guest, that combination doesn't work reliably even with v5.0.

What does that mean exactly?

If it can be fixed, we can try to.

> So I suppose people don't care.

There's that.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.