Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:03:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:03:09 -0400 Received: from artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.125]:58641 "EHLO artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:02:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 00:34:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikulas Patocka To: Pavel Machek cc: Robert-Velisav MICIOVICI , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [WISHLIST] Addition of suspend patch into 2.5? In-Reply-To: <20010402144053.B34@(none)> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Any idea if suspend/hybernation will be in future kernels? > > I'd like it included, too. Some toshiba laptops support sleep but not > suspend, and battery runs out within few hours if it was low before > suspend. That's bad. > > And the patch was pretty clean last time I checked. > Pavel Clean? I think it is impossible to write hibernation properly without adding suspend/resume hooks to all drivers. And I doubt anybody is able to do it. If we don't rewrite all drivers, hibernation will be just a 'cool feature' that doesn't work most time. Mikulas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/