Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp3805323yba; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:53:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8c6ddllheUN6ZaiApVShfUyCsd+u9YL5XolVc3Z/phY5tA2U56R0gbn7vsCVTi82D5Wr9 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:91d5:: with SMTP id z21mr5032869pfa.222.1555473190614; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:53:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555473190; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ppUrukbNH1ZO6PTwtOzujvGrJ/oEow7SY8VZF7zboj8kghSIX4pSGHworYaqxE8dRZ 0q/hfTvBckBg+oNzeD+vBGearpczC0ze1juqJy7fRG9ECROgFDAhoRVl0KD/8hgBuqd5 bXBfWVebTUAmoJbX2vq+5nOA0XjOxOVg07DBuLG354JsvwgWeshAvXXqKSnZNNmD9GKh zkhVrbBfm2WrupqHQ93W7D9IyahxUtYWizRT2LS+zbTHDlp9CSEx7eoIkxIYgHLHJwyc 2jwIyv19EWz2ymjnPz2J8WCQ1n2JJsizy6GPLHgi4lHgPCHzPG6vmqp+hKZGP06yCpJa lKhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=S+t9eOXeFbqGYs+RIQWWpMVXSDHY79M24t6nvEH5ceI=; b=q+dUGXOicQcXzNtEfsZzMKaHM2Em02+IE06bU92MC8JohUN02rIPZP8x4XOwemaWTL /8uYzPkQnLQZ5oXEyayGJmFksq2sFliYxEF/oViA3Y1Sw3PYktWz2yC6StIxABiWtx4E oHsP96czkBiPRxRXNEHWsYIPNnGZuiOZtC4IokV/DH7Z/xoH2LrMjT7pkgws95ge9q9v JYp2+D2IcYr4BvWaBFJx6Fv6Jp4xuUEI5CSc2wowsxy6bsVcmj5AzM4INfrAbjGxdWu4 eIvxa8ragwZoCnc5J5hKjiZNI5fRATswSAcqyGzyNPeARsmM+mQRx4wLAvU6OFQ2K/6l WrhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5si103423pgq.193.2019.04.16.20.52.54; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729657AbfDQDwP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:52:15 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35598 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727219AbfDQDwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:52:15 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-223-200-170.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.223.200.170]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93DCADA6; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:52:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mel Gorman Cc: David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , "Tobin C. Harding" , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Tejun Heo , Qian Cai , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer , David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm: Remove the SLAB allocator Message-Id: <20190416205212.5cb286fbeec801f50269b2b5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190412112816.GD18914@techsingularity.net> References: <20190410024714.26607-1-tobin@kernel.org> <20190412112816.GD18914@techsingularity.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:28:16 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:53:34PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > > FWIW, our enterprise kernel use it (latest is 4.12 based), and openSUSE > > > kernels as well (with openSUSE Tumbleweed that includes latest > > > kernel.org stables). AFAIK we don't enable SLAB_DEBUG even in general > > > debug kernel flavours as it's just too slow. > > > > > > IIRC last time Mel evaluated switching to SLUB, it wasn't a clear > > > winner, but I'll just CC him for details :) > > > > > > > We also use CONFIG_SLAB and disable CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG for the same reason. > > Would it be possible to re-evaluate using mainline kernel 5.0? I have vague memories that slab outperforms slub for some networking loads. Could the net folks please comment?