Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp4476824yba; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:18:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzYuNYvjH1TLUJLQ1OICYoxBU9j7F1K3RSuVgz+7Y7BIYQu/j44Lnrb9djjSo7y6522pCd0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:dc:: with SMTP id e28mr57281451pfj.186.1555528709603; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:18:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555528709; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BIo5qNhuL+jKnIylPJJQ8kjvqOMT+vUKKag52WIIwztykOPWfOqvw8TJo2hoCkBVKs NtyjiU6Wb0IyhwRDDd0x0sIrwrXaOQhOnnadnRfBN92IZaHRJ/ayG3J2lhLdlL2amsaZ i9CfiE+2K64/HzZ+sofTO5D7UL2P20f3dW43HFGesmILx2vw/PWGNabOBpeYciBoTRUR Z5WWajPG/OzyJPTTKb4eoVM+MYFdGb38Plgk0qfs3wjIrRJBXnsR15V1Zq1LUJaXFs40 gUwPbubrcCA2m5X8eaAMJ4FwUeTCwaUQqR91bJQX6cLBuPK2Y+nXcfavFjz8pg37IiPG +e2w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=WrFVWsTj4AUx36YQO+mAEFZaSupVKbjnPrtYOeZ0o0A=; b=QK5QETlrF5yDRdds9AVBDNXg+o1zmz3Oh7h6HLuNeGS6BLnA2AN0B5vTLY+k1qklAj C/WB21ga4sMOUGwWKu/14c5Nqf18Aa+NZ4GxZTv3lJ1aXZwRXx31xVBXgqFxrXDRwbiO rXMtbPXn+1GqqV2J0tme4mWjQ/xDbYA/7jJLHAWWqA13wDLHUGT9Xmsj5C54+qh7Hmc2 KdWJswRtpX3KdeckrIV7MTs9hTrE8fKs7xkg90a0fgJDVxscApgEfMw6rdtsM7LVhkCm NztfmpzuIZp9xZ24H9BIcopLt4VcX9HKabjnrA5Jz6QcmgFfJ8NRAf4YPuSMXkbARJ/t LSCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZJw61v+b; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u5si53075629pgl.36.2019.04.17.12.18.14; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZJw61v+b; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733244AbfDQTRI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:17:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:33314 "EHLO mail-wr1-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729291AbfDQTRI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:17:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id q1so33434023wrp.0; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:17:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WrFVWsTj4AUx36YQO+mAEFZaSupVKbjnPrtYOeZ0o0A=; b=ZJw61v+b2ERBBCTVtww3s0UTXbFHpoRXwPiC2G43gnHn20zCLa35UJSOasEHOUV75t xy0axIMTTOMZMVNOVS4XmLsg8sR6tf6/eT7Cr13txBjXT0uIm3vG2wsT9yOxvjOWBJ34 6ukIuE52V9jXqUsqyRtTa7RjISnogjQrGGbN5jXTlXCrZ0MAmx2VTCjaoPGAA0Al+9TD niN1s5T1FCR3XoWk2DQ0PlUghkwSi9CVCJ/FK0JBf2t2qrj2+1IC/12q/9tG1Oeoeg/5 wA2m+ShNJDPwddD1Ak0SE07JZV24ScMlNRBsvLE+R9GaIYfx3i4Cx2692NdJ0HHMUBJq 55QQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WrFVWsTj4AUx36YQO+mAEFZaSupVKbjnPrtYOeZ0o0A=; b=LbaylLQkU9NGG60mU3RmNO+NsSIIdlggg/TQhVhaOEk70UeEJsFyDOvRxhkbJ7LsLN o/yeqBt7qnE+EIg9sQnWvs1McOzvb44VwWgRf6G4vvpTxHHBckHDgJ6y7ynJPUCiBYjI 0XuqZzjM0hVSLGi++1gGRa+N9Q2rljG2X4lz3X5B115yK9oyY0ad59dzxE/U4Ez/IZs5 HnGRr0jxog5lOmeMcdgI7O6INPuGmBc21xXdorlqWBFOVeEkjpJILe+7Ig8YHYbcMls3 x+c96FlZOVdwTe+nLTqj6s1vDonzCDH8zf9mNQZDteZGv2e4j3DPuQx05yu9Nq2KVqsg GK6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVNT/dpz1NmZxs27MyQe9rVRHvvufSRCRirmNo0Tog83LqnRZph ePGEj0grCruuaKjyJuvReqs= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4d49:: with SMTP id a9mr58832578wru.227.1555528625919; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm95045206wrn.18.2019.04.17.12.17.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:17:02 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Daniel Drake , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds , Jian-Hong Pan , Matt Fleming , linux-efi , "Brown, Len" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , Endless Linux Upstreaming Team Subject: Re: EFI reboot vs. ACPI reboot (was: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/reboot, efi: Use EFI reboot for Acer TravelMate X514-51T) Message-ID: <20190417191702.GA29062@gmail.com> References: <20190416082042.GA69717@gmail.com> <20190417061650.GA31060@gmail.com> <17516564-37AC-4F77-9C0D-0DD71F8045EA@zytor.com> <20190417182341.GA5140@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 11:23, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Prakhya, Sai Praneeth wrote: > > > > > I will ask around internally to check if it is a good idea to make EFI > > > reboot the default method when the machine is booted in EFI mode. > > > > Or whether there's some robust signature that indicates "modern EFI > > system where EFI reboot is the primary method"? > > > > Major EFI version or ACPI version or such? > > > > I am actually at Microsoft right now, and I managed to get > clarification on how Windows deals with this: Windows will attempt to > use ACPI reboot first, and will only attempt to use anything else if > that fails. EFI reset is actually its least preferred option, and so > it is highly likely that it is untested on most of the shipping x86 > hardware if any of the other methods work. > > So let's not touch this. Agreed and that's really useful information, thanks! Ingo