Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp344816yba; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:11:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyT08vN5b5PXeE/X/weCKBrkq4PGUHS4i8L/yaxo066/Ge8QoKWE7QtTffCjeHlaG0cZ09Q X-Received: by 2002:a62:174c:: with SMTP id 73mr95100895pfx.33.1555578675163; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:11:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555578675; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RNVMIsLDu21an22TaoEB7NvvXW0IAmAwOpUEs2anXAdIgD+umwrrhqW5PQDHohAaMc 8QSNjtrdLxafgiUpp8y7offMTw2N/DLNgcOgZ4u+35P7HZdkEKD/AGLCYMZBh97suXq2 snXaQ8cyy7XZSm5nFW/xThXFOfSQ8QRLUlxylXH2R19vfTpm5PkKy2qp1AOT4+jvtswv /lD31mDmTSBRvKRKDYageKPaGeCdM8y8NPFidewH5fALnrwvnQ8HIuqoZXO8ZbPOdFdX Dj7ytWBwXhMnKWVvQkfSDA+Y+1Xp2uaQh80/5iSAbj+jWW2UGyu5KmsSiQAwjvDUdiW+ oHJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=AjyEUT+ab80WGVik8eC4hnVor/wcNPvxm5+K1GbKPVU=; b=TzwEU5VLW5LYXu2DTTkbk9hrmqxxBqFPortvlc4XR3eN5QA3SPivG0+n7HI+0pVsYe Ksr5Ik0BEldTBXkeWAisGP/R5E41SijIpY+d+MNElU3DJxvCoQ91ZIp99nUwqoSlP8FQ ZC7++TmXEdh2sQz13EBf1d74oW97qEVfYpK4ksmEJj9u8FRjzxr9xARo48motxo9MWX3 EBQlPUNOcalpHv2vZHXc0FNTCl7XCyKZbj5yTH+SD+d00pw86j/BH4bwn6yIdmrDGVc2 c6b7CnPFoOoxYrv8AZ+lB7DAffvAx7e+t+joBQRMYg94AR5h7AyXSOWauPMTco0Q9KrS 1ttQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="nJ2/WBaM"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v12si1414493pgh.303.2019.04.18.02.11.00; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="nJ2/WBaM"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388374AbfDRJJX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 05:09:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]:42541 "EHLO mail-ot1-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726873AbfDRJJU (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 05:09:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 103so1095153otd.9 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:09:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AjyEUT+ab80WGVik8eC4hnVor/wcNPvxm5+K1GbKPVU=; b=nJ2/WBaMZxihi8ZoJKr+xJATIygjafUtMqTcFAWJJ1xJonmnn02k1UPZOCxEsP8Eii y8le723HAb0OvyCHTmTa8yNWoqdrgbljEw/bUx31ETSTGb5UJ6dpb9cPdmxN3Tm4Q9W9 imdWIOx2YR/YvjzV0vQL97h2LzpR46YrQ69hw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AjyEUT+ab80WGVik8eC4hnVor/wcNPvxm5+K1GbKPVU=; b=T070kVPs6zg5XuW2p/0rbGeCSDclvg9R2/ABLvUegHqPdyfMWymjnK0Cp94mcS/bMT sjuRadhp/Yt2bDSonv/Bw0e3Hh3CuABvdWspfVak16HcsFvxR9Ms6KmcZPMiWMZmbxhD tYtOS4cHNoy5hhVqwhdMz1n8I6rdktsBeJaKIAoPbTtozIJV5rh+txQkhpBZlWrKS3Uo 0RxAuy2hiuDVCdf69/AQlxkorJKmAmUa3oKNmg4hK732USVgFXTZZ3uCK8qws3mhPsnB Wfvf/WBhGrToK7+l3E3TAqRddRpMTdMTdWSu9sciEslVzrG9EwMEKYy8QO5cOwHuTkcB ZBzA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxnVnpcUDTePgTyVpqjKKubCrCNRxtzndov5Jf8HvK91EaDyjL zZB93Zv8jDnJw/FnD7rKOCWzcL7WKNE= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:27e3:: with SMTP id c90mr58703286otb.214.1555578559020; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com. [209.85.210.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v201sm703991oia.39.2019.04.18.02.09.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id e80so1120104ote.5 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:09:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:ef4:: with SMTP id 107mr59375180otj.152.1555578557366; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:09:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0df3d4b5178d8a37b67b275e0771741c6c268de3.camel@bootlin.com> <20190418081816.GO13337@phenom.ffwll.local> <522d6a7734a29df47fe11f5f6311b49e14dabae0.camel@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <522d6a7734a29df47fe11f5f6311b49e14dabae0.camel@bootlin.com> From: Tomasz Figa Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:09:06 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Support for 2D engines/blitters in V4L2 and DRM To: Paul Kocialkowski Cc: Daniel Vetter , Nicolas Dufresne , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexandre Courbot , Maxime Ripard , Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Media Mailing List , dri-devel , Thomas Petazzoni , Eric Anholt , Rob Clark , Dave Airlie , Maarten Lankhorst Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 10:18 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:10:15PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > > > I'm detaching this thread from our V4L2 stateless decoding spec since > > > it has drifted off and would certainly be interesting to DRM folks as > > > well! > > > > > > For context: I was initially talking about writing up support for the > > > Allwinner 2D engine as a DRM render driver, where I'd like to be able > > > to batch jobs that affect the same destination buffer to only signal > > > the out fence once when the batch is done. We have a similar issue in > > > v4l2 where we'd like the destination buffer for a set of requests (each > > > covering one H264 slice) to be marked as done once the set was decoded. > > > Out of curiosity, what area did you find a 2D blitter useful for? Best regards, Tomasz