Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp590810yba; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:29:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/NKgx0lvoQDexjVoZmlit18Zd+XneO58cTzUFgucunEVkyGwPjo2grSkAxi2hrDvI6ozT X-Received: by 2002:a62:6ec6:: with SMTP id j189mr14698475pfc.195.1555594170603; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:29:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555594170; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BPEr14Oab0jImbcMX5R4TKiL5hvA7aJl4sJboXXcLw30TUw0ds15PaxnQosemmasAV IpWPdIVwY8o+Bn8djSU/alzpPNs34YjXDZWXvRVSJYl2lDbNFGCM+qapRVau5nU0PyyQ T9e+YMk1KMt266RPj323qHR+OTIe6kpYHU10JDBPVQOvNOuFQHYNQA290roter+KXiLy lCMCJOmO2FfwfXopcfHMF1XabraL7rJ4baJVWCnxCKup92fxR/QnzvEZJzQ8lDP3/DTY Rja3wy4Ik7SDL0Nraxq4DI9eW3sb04KwnlbAldIhkYG01gLBveWQxoEz94Y4Hg7ZBRV7 /MAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:openpgp:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=GGS16IOrEbK+2l8+yAAHJ8wBz+kfPlgTY2TcQ+8K10M=; b=OzjcFs1mnO+NRhYlB3l1Mc+C6hskOBuZ/NNyqlS7ZAB+StB9J31y0K3Ehyjxf2muD3 3+7mGNboO1hqHt0klz9k3lb5FsqGDLrX9Ao0m4ZCOmNjyLz+GE6lRwgm5yqRSIaVpYXI l+1RiIeNGcEDXSozp+lJ/S6X06PrPxEXs5k26y2pVgD6J//c/FFKZKEbbLCjIWULcb1Y kttNm7Nb+okWbf6wdShiklfO9VMIh92Mb91VnH98EQeLqGdMTECPMI2WyURnGLPO2o2C Pm44DAeQIS8EmBxGmaKfBQV4/tsz1XsW64j7XCFE3OSb3Gh+sgomciVEZ/JfgKl0lftZ F2Og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u192si1969355pgc.282.2019.04.18.06.29.15; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389112AbfDRN1y (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:27:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44026 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388263AbfDRN1x (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:27:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F42C0270D3; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (dhcp-17-19.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7469D1001E65; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] locking/rwsem: Ensure an RT task will not spin on reader To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Linus Torvalds , Tim Chen , huang ying References: <20190413172259.2740-1-longman@redhat.com> <20190413172259.2740-10-longman@redhat.com> <20190417131841.GF4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1c37b8f2-232e-7ced-0483-31c8c6a4ffd1@redhat.com> <20190418085227.GV12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Waiman Long Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=longman@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFgsZGsBEAC3l/RVYISY3M0SznCZOv8aWc/bsAgif1H8h0WPDrHnwt1jfFTB26EzhRea XQKAJiZbjnTotxXq1JVaWxJcNJL7crruYeFdv7WUJqJzFgHnNM/upZuGsDIJHyqBHWK5X9ZO jRyfqV/i3Ll7VIZobcRLbTfEJgyLTAHn2Ipcpt8mRg2cck2sC9+RMi45Epweu7pKjfrF8JUY r71uif2ThpN8vGpn+FKbERFt4hW2dV/3awVckxxHXNrQYIB3I/G6mUdEZ9yrVrAfLw5M3fVU CRnC6fbroC6/ztD40lyTQWbCqGERVEwHFYYoxrcGa8AzMXN9CN7bleHmKZrGxDFWbg4877zX 0YaLRypme4K0ULbnNVRQcSZ9UalTvAzjpyWnlnXCLnFjzhV7qsjozloLTkZjyHimSc3yllH7 VvP/lGHnqUk7xDymgRHNNn0wWPuOpR97J/r7V1mSMZlni/FVTQTRu87aQRYu3nKhcNJ47TGY evz/U0ltaZEU41t7WGBnC7RlxYtdXziEn5fC8b1JfqiP0OJVQfdIMVIbEw1turVouTovUA39 Qqa6Pd1oYTw+Bdm1tkx7di73qB3x4pJoC8ZRfEmPqSpmu42sijWSBUgYJwsziTW2SBi4hRjU h/Tm0NuU1/R1bgv/EzoXjgOM4ZlSu6Pv7ICpELdWSrvkXJIuIwARAQABzR9Mb25nbWFuIExv bmcgPGxsb25nQHJlZGhhdC5jb20+wsF/BBMBAgApBQJYLGRrAhsjBQkJZgGABwsJCAcDAgEG FQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQbjBXZE7vHeYwBA//ZYxi4I/4KVrqc6oodVfwPnOVxvyY oKZGPXZXAa3swtPGmRFc8kGyIMZpVTqGJYGD9ZDezxpWIkVQDnKM9zw/qGarUVKzElGHcuFN ddtwX64yxDhA+3Og8MTy8+8ZucM4oNsbM9Dx171bFnHjWSka8o6qhK5siBAf9WXcPNogUk4S fMNYKxexcUayv750GK5E8RouG0DrjtIMYVJwu+p3X1bRHHDoieVfE1i380YydPd7mXa7FrRl 7unTlrxUyJSiBc83HgKCdFC8+ggmRVisbs+1clMsK++ehz08dmGlbQD8Fv2VK5KR2+QXYLU0 rRQjXk/gJ8wcMasuUcywnj8dqqO3kIS1EfshrfR/xCNSREcv2fwHvfJjprpoE9tiL1qP7Jrq 4tUYazErOEQJcE8Qm3fioh40w8YrGGYEGNA4do/jaHXm1iB9rShXE2jnmy3ttdAh3M8W2OMK 4B/Rlr+Awr2NlVdvEF7iL70kO+aZeOu20Lq6mx4Kvq/WyjZg8g+vYGCExZ7sd8xpncBSl7b3 99AIyT55HaJjrs5F3Rl8dAklaDyzXviwcxs+gSYvRCr6AMzevmfWbAILN9i1ZkfbnqVdpaag QmWlmPuKzqKhJP+OMYSgYnpd/vu5FBbc+eXpuhydKqtUVOWjtp5hAERNnSpD87i1TilshFQm TFxHDzbOwU0EWCxkawEQALAcdzzKsZbcdSi1kgjfce9AMjyxkkZxcGc6Rhwvt78d66qIFK9D Y9wfcZBpuFY/AcKEqjTo4FZ5LCa7/dXNwOXOdB1Jfp54OFUqiYUJFymFKInHQYlmoES9EJEU yy+2ipzy5yGbLh3ZqAXyZCTmUKBU7oz/waN7ynEP0S0DqdWgJnpEiFjFN4/ovf9uveUnjzB6 lzd0BDckLU4dL7aqe2ROIHyG3zaBMuPo66pN3njEr7IcyAL6aK/IyRrwLXoxLMQW7YQmFPSw drATP3WO0x8UGaXlGMVcaeUBMJlqTyN4Swr2BbqBcEGAMPjFCm6MjAPv68h5hEoB9zvIg+fq M1/Gs4D8H8kUjOEOYtmVQ5RZQschPJle95BzNwE3Y48ZH5zewgU7ByVJKSgJ9HDhwX8Ryuia 79r86qZeFjXOUXZjjWdFDKl5vaiRbNWCpuSG1R1Tm8o/rd2NZ6l8LgcK9UcpWorrPknbE/pm MUeZ2d3ss5G5Vbb0bYVFRtYQiCCfHAQHO6uNtA9IztkuMpMRQDUiDoApHwYUY5Dqasu4ZDJk bZ8lC6qc2NXauOWMDw43z9He7k6LnYm/evcD+0+YebxNsorEiWDgIW8Q/E+h6RMS9kW3Rv1N qd2nFfiC8+p9I/KLcbV33tMhF1+dOgyiL4bcYeR351pnyXBPA66ldNWvABEBAAHCwWUEGAEC AA8FAlgsZGsCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQbjBXZE7vHeYxSQ/+PnnPrOkKHDHQew8Pq9w2RAOO8gMg 9Ty4L54CsTf21Mqc6GXj6LN3WbQta7CVA0bKeq0+WnmsZ9jkTNh8lJp0/RnZkSUsDT9Tza9r GB0svZnBJMFJgSMfmwa3cBttCh+vqDV3ZIVSG54nPmGfUQMFPlDHccjWIvTvyY3a9SLeamaR jOGye8MQAlAD40fTWK2no6L1b8abGtziTkNh68zfu3wjQkXk4kA4zHroE61PpS3oMD4AyI9L 7A4Zv0Cvs2MhYQ4Qbbmafr+NOhzuunm5CoaRi+762+c508TqgRqH8W1htZCzab0pXHRfywtv 0P+BMT7vN2uMBdhr8c0b/hoGqBTenOmFt71tAyyGcPgI3f7DUxy+cv3GzenWjrvf3uFpxYx4 yFQkUcu06wa61nCdxXU/BWFItryAGGdh2fFXnIYP8NZfdA+zmpymJXDQeMsAEHS0BLTVQ3+M 7W5Ak8p9V+bFMtteBgoM23bskH6mgOAw6Cj/USW4cAJ8b++9zE0/4Bv4iaY5bcsL+h7TqQBH Lk1eByJeVooUa/mqa2UdVJalc8B9NrAnLiyRsg72Nurwzvknv7anSgIkL+doXDaG21DgCYTD wGA5uquIgb8p3/ENgYpDPrsZ72CxVC2NEJjJwwnRBStjJOGQX4lV1uhN1XsZjBbRHdKF2W9g weim8xU= Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <3cfd8e6c-e621-a080-8227-3ea84aadc0d0@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:27:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190418085227.GV12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/18/2019 04:52 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:47:07PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>> @@ -566,13 +573,28 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem) >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* >>>> - * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the >>>> - * owner acquiring the lock and setting the owner field. If >>>> - * we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let >>>> - * the owner complete. >>>> + * An RT task cannot do optimistic spinning if it cannot >>>> + * be sure the lock holder is running or live-lock may >>>> + * happen if the current task and the lock holder happen >>>> + * to run in the same CPU. >>>> + * >>>> + * When there's no owner or is reader-owned, an RT task >>>> + * will stop spinning if the owner state is not a writer >>>> + * at the previous iteration of the loop. This allows the >>>> + * RT task to recheck if the task that steals the lock is >>>> + * a spinnable writer. If so, it can keeps on spinning. >>>> + * >>>> + * If the owner is a writer, the need_resched() check is >>>> + * done inside rwsem_spin_on_owner(). If the owner is not >>>> + * a writer, need_resched() check needs to be done here. >>>> */ >>>> - if (!sem->owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(current))) >>>> - break; >>>> + if (owner_state != OWNER_WRITER) { >>>> + if (need_resched()) >>>> + break; >>>> + if (is_rt_task && (prev_owner_state != OWNER_WRITER)) >>>> + break; >>>> + } >>>> + prev_owner_state = owner_state; >>>> >>>> /* >>>> * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces >>> This patch confuses me mightily. I mean, I see what it does, but I can't >>> figure out why. The Changelog is just one big source of confusion. >> Sorry for confusing you. If count and owner are separate, there is a >> time lag where the owner is NULL, but the lock is not free yet. > Right. > >> Similarly, the lock could be free but another task may have stolen the >> lock if the waiter bit isn't set. >> In the former case, > (free) > >> an extra iteration gives it more time for the lock holder to release >> the lock. > >> In the latter case, > (stolen) > >> if the new lock owner is a writer and set owner in time, >> the RT task can keep on spinning. Will clarify that in the commit log >> and the comment. > Blergh.. so by going around once extra, you hope ->owner will be set > again and we keep spinning. And this is actually measurable. Right. That is the plan. > > Yuck yuck yuck. I much prefer getting rid of that hole, as you do later > on in the series, that would avoid this complecity. Let me continue > reading... Well, there is limitation in merging owner to rwsem. First of all, we can't do that for 32-bit. Right now owner merging is enabled for x86-64 only. I will need to study the max physical address bits for the other architectures later on once I am done with this patchset. So doing an extra loop will still be helpful. Cheers, Longman