Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABXGCsM8gjvh8x9QyzbrbnSb-NmWpmmEUJnFiFv5MaPkcG=Ubg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABXGCsMcS+H9jxEotmM3u8F28zhPobvT3+Hd_iWstFQN744v6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904141948200.4917@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CABXGCsNaw=mb0YF4Bkd5_CTwMfU=dNZ=RTV96dwO=UQy=n_gOQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABXGCsNaw=mb0YF4Bkd5_CTwMfU=dNZ=RTV96dwO=UQy=n_gOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:52:36 +0500
Message-ID: <CABXGCsP414BbijQQ+NJkCV83zdCKcfCyR0NBwyor6z3T8CawDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [5.0.0 rc3 BUG] possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 01:07, Mikhail Gavrilov
<mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, with this patch problem was gone.
> We have time land it in 5.1?
>

I received automated email with follow content:

> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: 1f50ddb4f418 x86/speculation: Handle HT correctly on AMD.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.0.7, v4.19.34, v4.14.111, v4.9=
.168, v4.4.178.
>
> v5.0.7: Build OK!
> v4.19.34: Build OK!
> v4.14.111: Build failed! Errors:
>     arch/x86/kernel/process.c:417:2: error: implicit declaration of funct=
ion =E2=80=98lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled=E2=80=99; did you mean =E2=80=98l=
ockdep_assert_cpus_held=E2=80=99? [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration]
>
> v4.9.168: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     01daf56875ee ("x86/speculation: Reorganize speculation control MSRs u=
pdate")
>     26c4d75b2340 ("x86/speculation: Rename SSBD update functions")
>     5bfbe3ad5840 ("x86/speculation: Prepare for per task indirect branch =
speculation control")
>
> v4.4.178: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     01daf56875ee ("x86/speculation: Reorganize speculation control MSRs u=
pdate")
>     26c4d75b2340 ("x86/speculation: Rename SSBD update functions")
>     5bfbe3ad5840 ("x86/speculation: Prepare for per task indirect branch =
speculation control")
>     cc69b3498921 ("x86/bugs: Unify x86_spec_ctrl_{set_guest,restore_host}=
")
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?

So I wonder is any further actions are required for merging patch to mainli=
ne?

--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.