Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:11 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To:     Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Cc:     grygorii.strashko@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, hawk@kernel.org,
        xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        aniel@iogearbox.net, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support
Message-ID: <20190418104111.559a0e74@cakuba.netronome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190418094008.GB27879@khorivan>
References: <20190417174942.11811-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
        <20190417174942.11811-4-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
        <CAJpBn1y0odvL97-kP5yzKC+tN=fx178nxigfBfDwXhRhPRvDuQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <20190418094008.GB27879@khorivan>
Organization: Netronome Systems, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:40:10 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> >work?  The stack's TX ring has a lock, and can be used from any CPU,
> >while XDP TX rings are per-PCU, no?  
> Yes and no.
> am572 has more queues then CPU num, How I can choose tx queue not based on CPU
> num? It's always shared and has to have lock, and cpdma is done in this way.

Oh, I see, you already have another lock.

> Here another thing bothering me, I send it to queue 0 always, instead of
> taking cpu num. Not sure about this, but I expect to have some tx queue
> not bind to cpu and didn't find a way it can be changed dynamically in
> redirect.

Not sure I understand :)