Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1138578yba; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVx2Ih+UQewFs4VADwzrZGaEvMoQQ9BXbQm92hf91o6+mU1Jkmg/6OpZNiklQsPsTmIyyf X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b706:: with SMTP id d6mr303588pls.250.1555628956898; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555628956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XlIHmY+c5+p/M7xQXiscN9/Z/R+othxWOXFv5yGSiOop45zMrmpiD9s/kC8twj2ut2 J7uQM2ylUfUoWHSowY6HB/K9rjSF0pxvdc4Ry8osW1CfgnBKc6leRtvTRE29czFv0ucX BXHPrMaiXnLktmh69m+MfZ21db67MqtwErnGBYBVSGInlWg+/+m8hEhZBKFZ59gfWBmz aaDvsKwciMIwMnsxqF6VZEbbZoXRygG2e9o2LE6N09RUYpf5PksbBC7wBmPEKlmMVeip jn4I+pq7wHTqGbaRt6HTkcFSj3ue54giCNAz0b0JKYgAfZCB4jG86SneHRJFTfC6WcHr IqEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=DAJ8vJLpLY4+/YpRDs8b7p5FydfoH7kr8ue6X8r81BY=; b=C3OIgWTZNCKLLNnesVAx/8m+l9eQepdc7CN6eMtAWx7BL4upYUZ3eBAOz+QfJ4pnzz cBQ5A3EJc8pAhA+/yoTOPknoaAzwZIGkLZfaRe3s6cP00bTiQ7m22Ld5if8SWMFUYd/2 8nTv2AjEt6nPtpRYEIpuoSu23wrwBrv7uFq77C/GMl/EJtmaSzjclnQEvykAhRrBVvP3 RQZ/NqWmQf2vrnhMHx2cug3tqlU3m+8U2j5eLqwMbRRCCB7lE06W4C4Ubr6+ahVZAms9 1KxllejgzYb+GpH3klqHy+N4hYfBHAoVFl+VBoacpqXaquEzhjXq0tsj9UDzvMYFlID/ 1fYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q4si3628309pfb.264.2019.04.18.16.09.01; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726318AbfDRXGy (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:06:54 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35590 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725887AbfDRXGy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:06:54 -0400 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D06C1749; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:06:51 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Douglas Anderson , Daniel Thompson , Jason Wessel , Christophe Leroy , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Kees Cook , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, Johannes Weiner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Nicholas Mc Guire , Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: Get rid of broken attempt to print CCVERSION in kdb summary Message-Id: <20190418160651.40cb6a11186a6c6028e9d20d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20190323015227.245455-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20190416163034.3e642818ebf27ed6891c1981@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:37:49 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > It's pretty benign: Doug will still only get a single email. > > > > > > checkpatch checks for duplicates cc's but I think it assumes that > > things like > > > > Reported-by: fred > > Tested-by: fred > > > > were intentional. > > > > It would perhaps be better for checkpatch to special-case the "Cc: > > fred" tag and report a duplicated Cc: if fred was also mentioned in any > > other tag. > > Sorry, I do not understand what you mean. > > > Douglas did not add any Cc: tag at all > in his original patch: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053953/ > > > It's you who added the Cc: tags > (and I am guessing you did it by scripting.) > > Why is this topic related to checkpatch? Because I regularly check all patches with checkpatch but checkpatch failed to detect that I had Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson ... Cc: Douglas Anderson and I believe that checkpatch could and should have warned about this situation.