Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2084354yba; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:49:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgXsEUNeUl2KMnTxWSa6NzdD2han1ofeQoBCgKCRzVXOa/7JBXpHbFILn66ztDwpYjsb6Y X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb4d:: with SMTP id w13mr5368923pgj.397.1555699763319; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:49:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555699763; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zqz1OsHBbTdFSNhhYSE5Qrm5xaDeWKV34WYBFeZ+r0yF4hX36s4C72+cUj9EjLwgdQ 3iirEj6o4YUMalKh7fUp1RjJF5DUREcP/FKK4BK79kDxXsF8a/Il1SI+xr1jGQa6XAXv tOcITDXHm0aAOo8cPEA8StTeJfzymdOw1J+VDSHzxZTgYv6C+BdsGJShTomncWJTDdz9 YV537PL4HOKdC7+YSdU1eNHtFyU06e3b2KzmR4nKDGi2BkdOjKKMhp4h39bIXjUpWVM5 4W9DJna9CXOCP+Q207KgxXuLBhZi2Un068GqCvEgItohZAF8aJ5PUtMUUlGWU6lwxm2Q muXg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:openpgp:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=fDrRsI0cLeWSaGcQkKtNtJNLG4E0IDlFDueAUl9p9SM=; b=dzoUMlk/g+WUluT6vGOYEjfNIHH90+ZBgWTFD166i2zVZ2aYEqGHM5ipfwBVj9WJSQ josNdERj4a3fENyXSHqHORJAkjrsI3HmenmcoNWRFzplWm544xNvZnmmPFXGrpHJBlyg WbJC+CzUq6k0YUe3+b86H51yBLFG31zFLio6Gsv9y/VJa9+Yp5slUSuvBfQS9ZBz4iak gz4BMWo7Ql6V3B0DJtwjK7fmALbo1qYaJ4n8r9vP2JxIZiaWigpVw+TkvQ6XlR+qZ3ZK vdttl0RLxhttZnPSODZJW65L3nHvXpWm3aAVwgAviSEJ3eBInNWSaRhfI4pgiEfnFp3x IhOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o24si5322314pgh.260.2019.04.19.11.49.08; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728442AbfDSSsS (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:48:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33678 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725870AbfDSSsS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:48:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53EEC03D470; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (dhcp-17-19.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCA019C58; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/16] locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Linus Torvalds , Tim Chen , huang ying References: <20190413172259.2740-1-longman@redhat.com> <20190413172259.2740-13-longman@redhat.com> <20190418130611.GK4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <52aee7c3-b8aa-a617-c1f2-34bc99c72474@redhat.com> <20190419075610.GN4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Waiman Long Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=longman@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFgsZGsBEAC3l/RVYISY3M0SznCZOv8aWc/bsAgif1H8h0WPDrHnwt1jfFTB26EzhRea XQKAJiZbjnTotxXq1JVaWxJcNJL7crruYeFdv7WUJqJzFgHnNM/upZuGsDIJHyqBHWK5X9ZO jRyfqV/i3Ll7VIZobcRLbTfEJgyLTAHn2Ipcpt8mRg2cck2sC9+RMi45Epweu7pKjfrF8JUY r71uif2ThpN8vGpn+FKbERFt4hW2dV/3awVckxxHXNrQYIB3I/G6mUdEZ9yrVrAfLw5M3fVU CRnC6fbroC6/ztD40lyTQWbCqGERVEwHFYYoxrcGa8AzMXN9CN7bleHmKZrGxDFWbg4877zX 0YaLRypme4K0ULbnNVRQcSZ9UalTvAzjpyWnlnXCLnFjzhV7qsjozloLTkZjyHimSc3yllH7 VvP/lGHnqUk7xDymgRHNNn0wWPuOpR97J/r7V1mSMZlni/FVTQTRu87aQRYu3nKhcNJ47TGY evz/U0ltaZEU41t7WGBnC7RlxYtdXziEn5fC8b1JfqiP0OJVQfdIMVIbEw1turVouTovUA39 Qqa6Pd1oYTw+Bdm1tkx7di73qB3x4pJoC8ZRfEmPqSpmu42sijWSBUgYJwsziTW2SBi4hRjU h/Tm0NuU1/R1bgv/EzoXjgOM4ZlSu6Pv7ICpELdWSrvkXJIuIwARAQABzR9Mb25nbWFuIExv bmcgPGxsb25nQHJlZGhhdC5jb20+wsF/BBMBAgApBQJYLGRrAhsjBQkJZgGABwsJCAcDAgEG FQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQbjBXZE7vHeYwBA//ZYxi4I/4KVrqc6oodVfwPnOVxvyY oKZGPXZXAa3swtPGmRFc8kGyIMZpVTqGJYGD9ZDezxpWIkVQDnKM9zw/qGarUVKzElGHcuFN ddtwX64yxDhA+3Og8MTy8+8ZucM4oNsbM9Dx171bFnHjWSka8o6qhK5siBAf9WXcPNogUk4S fMNYKxexcUayv750GK5E8RouG0DrjtIMYVJwu+p3X1bRHHDoieVfE1i380YydPd7mXa7FrRl 7unTlrxUyJSiBc83HgKCdFC8+ggmRVisbs+1clMsK++ehz08dmGlbQD8Fv2VK5KR2+QXYLU0 rRQjXk/gJ8wcMasuUcywnj8dqqO3kIS1EfshrfR/xCNSREcv2fwHvfJjprpoE9tiL1qP7Jrq 4tUYazErOEQJcE8Qm3fioh40w8YrGGYEGNA4do/jaHXm1iB9rShXE2jnmy3ttdAh3M8W2OMK 4B/Rlr+Awr2NlVdvEF7iL70kO+aZeOu20Lq6mx4Kvq/WyjZg8g+vYGCExZ7sd8xpncBSl7b3 99AIyT55HaJjrs5F3Rl8dAklaDyzXviwcxs+gSYvRCr6AMzevmfWbAILN9i1ZkfbnqVdpaag QmWlmPuKzqKhJP+OMYSgYnpd/vu5FBbc+eXpuhydKqtUVOWjtp5hAERNnSpD87i1TilshFQm TFxHDzbOwU0EWCxkawEQALAcdzzKsZbcdSi1kgjfce9AMjyxkkZxcGc6Rhwvt78d66qIFK9D Y9wfcZBpuFY/AcKEqjTo4FZ5LCa7/dXNwOXOdB1Jfp54OFUqiYUJFymFKInHQYlmoES9EJEU yy+2ipzy5yGbLh3ZqAXyZCTmUKBU7oz/waN7ynEP0S0DqdWgJnpEiFjFN4/ovf9uveUnjzB6 lzd0BDckLU4dL7aqe2ROIHyG3zaBMuPo66pN3njEr7IcyAL6aK/IyRrwLXoxLMQW7YQmFPSw drATP3WO0x8UGaXlGMVcaeUBMJlqTyN4Swr2BbqBcEGAMPjFCm6MjAPv68h5hEoB9zvIg+fq M1/Gs4D8H8kUjOEOYtmVQ5RZQschPJle95BzNwE3Y48ZH5zewgU7ByVJKSgJ9HDhwX8Ryuia 79r86qZeFjXOUXZjjWdFDKl5vaiRbNWCpuSG1R1Tm8o/rd2NZ6l8LgcK9UcpWorrPknbE/pm MUeZ2d3ss5G5Vbb0bYVFRtYQiCCfHAQHO6uNtA9IztkuMpMRQDUiDoApHwYUY5Dqasu4ZDJk bZ8lC6qc2NXauOWMDw43z9He7k6LnYm/evcD+0+YebxNsorEiWDgIW8Q/E+h6RMS9kW3Rv1N qd2nFfiC8+p9I/KLcbV33tMhF1+dOgyiL4bcYeR351pnyXBPA66ldNWvABEBAAHCwWUEGAEC AA8FAlgsZGsCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQbjBXZE7vHeYxSQ/+PnnPrOkKHDHQew8Pq9w2RAOO8gMg 9Ty4L54CsTf21Mqc6GXj6LN3WbQta7CVA0bKeq0+WnmsZ9jkTNh8lJp0/RnZkSUsDT9Tza9r GB0svZnBJMFJgSMfmwa3cBttCh+vqDV3ZIVSG54nPmGfUQMFPlDHccjWIvTvyY3a9SLeamaR jOGye8MQAlAD40fTWK2no6L1b8abGtziTkNh68zfu3wjQkXk4kA4zHroE61PpS3oMD4AyI9L 7A4Zv0Cvs2MhYQ4Qbbmafr+NOhzuunm5CoaRi+762+c508TqgRqH8W1htZCzab0pXHRfywtv 0P+BMT7vN2uMBdhr8c0b/hoGqBTenOmFt71tAyyGcPgI3f7DUxy+cv3GzenWjrvf3uFpxYx4 yFQkUcu06wa61nCdxXU/BWFItryAGGdh2fFXnIYP8NZfdA+zmpymJXDQeMsAEHS0BLTVQ3+M 7W5Ak8p9V+bFMtteBgoM23bskH6mgOAw6Cj/USW4cAJ8b++9zE0/4Bv4iaY5bcsL+h7TqQBH Lk1eByJeVooUa/mqa2UdVJalc8B9NrAnLiyRsg72Nurwzvknv7anSgIkL+doXDaG21DgCYTD wGA5uquIgb8p3/ENgYpDPrsZ72CxVC2NEJjJwwnRBStjJOGQX4lV1uhN1XsZjBbRHdKF2W9g weim8xU= Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:33:14 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190419075610.GN4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/19/2019 03:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:15:33AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 04/18/2019 09:06 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> + /* >>>> + * Check time threshold every 16 iterations to >>>> + * avoid calling sched_clock() too frequently. >>>> + * This will make the actual spinning time a >>>> + * bit more than that specified in the threshold. >>>> + */ >>>> + else if (!(++loop & 0xf) && >>>> + (sched_clock() > rspin_threshold)) { >>> Why is calling sched_clock() lots a problem? >> Actually I am more concern about the latency introduced by the >> sched_clock() call. BTW, I haven't done any measurement myself. Do you >> know how much cost the sched_clock() call is? >> >> If the cost is relatively high, the average latency period after the >> lock is free and the spinner is ready to do a trylock will increase. > Totally depends on the arch or course :/ For 'sane' x86 it is: RDTSC, > MUL; SHRD; SHR; ADD, which is plenty fast. > > I know we have poll loops with sched_clock/local_clock in them, I just > can't seem to find any atm. Thanks, I will do some time measurement myself. If it is fast enough, I can change the code to do sched_clock on every iteration. Cheers, Longman