Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2101252yba; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyLm000tc6X/NGxoVK1MV7htQh30K+Q1csI5sO4KgPzbprtZNTYvspyldoEtH3TWbXmBGBf X-Received: by 2002:a65:4185:: with SMTP id a5mr5412939pgq.82.1555700922905; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555700922; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L+TjtPiH7jNYp8LTnMkrw4OgbO4RfM8hmT5biwnZFHy/dCRjj9aAmxbZ7Y7L5xkeXP XGVT2oHuw4LfDxjvl0gn2rbzEfZ2n7dAG4+XvopB7WD3ZYWc0+aHDZ5ZEB9ZCQKMJ1US s6TUgdAbkU6Vi/zQOsxGYdJFp5OkTOcoYyl2qeX37VHAeVqOZ7OCrWGwDxq6j9atX+Wh MXuD9/WginoVN8T37/ZPLpaq3T44mmPWPNEQ6vtPEwztZIIue6Lb9xjmvvnznDo0U33t iNbok51N1HtLHZJOjPgSOg/ZFlMqsMvD+qFsluoufTsbfJBly+G6fZ2xBjs56zp210cR WrEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=AdlqMNaLNIUwAQPpuXGhRQfoDFNz32pxi9mvWn75Usc=; b=mFk/meSnugAwkMaiDNUP1xui9TirmHU0TEPXzZGwSe4igTmO7i/cbHzXnqinv+CLqH 5pdwD9Q4JDXVQhP8G7syX6QhA39B0hzb4gMSYlFXcOiV5BONJT0lXF0R7HzuvaS7uiJV 17P4MGeZtGfV7DX6JNp6jWuwopxluvPiEuIErXZo4fWdD0i/XrnAyqBc82hnmjo4ZV/M JG2S3jbhDl56cBZtdNNaBEq1GV+dSHzgbO6y93SaGntmV4UJQMMjfQZAUZwRV/zlszRL HVZux1ybc1BnNuLEXUUWLdI6a7Db7aoBc6Y94N2plNGWaVRS9CKB3EWzPPS/bm7n5alV UihQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.s=google header.b=yc7BySIb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 33si5916499plc.303.2019.04.19.12.08.28; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.s=google header.b=yc7BySIb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729578AbfDSTFn (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:05:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:34478 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729055AbfDSTFl (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:05:41 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id b3so2933122pfd.1 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelfernandes.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=AdlqMNaLNIUwAQPpuXGhRQfoDFNz32pxi9mvWn75Usc=; b=yc7BySIbEieSuzGNYU3PloZV2SqBj/vts66Bq7IE7Ccr3AvIRcxGFEUFvbJ6Ma0ucV NSmkoVDbDQEZhwGgh1Jp/E2B9+DieYltLy2D1WDGZPgkRd6yaFFvMr3jIwaefOxdaH4h /EsGItuGBYRKibUEykMMXnvv2Cs7mRHbKS9G0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=AdlqMNaLNIUwAQPpuXGhRQfoDFNz32pxi9mvWn75Usc=; b=e6oOOZGRmtxD3n9A+NDbOH7lrII6t5LPR1L5GMEfIh3fTinf2jG10PAeCCp8WLgE1t OVmJDj48NruUufoHxgXpr/zej7th5b56/OVS+xJHiOg0XlO/6Kh8zlFSUs++2e6ZKGXo q11rt+pnW/d1fWYn1gMd0z6O3PDeDakCL4EVo3BraNbOSmtQ3vUxD41aLvOIKJFQvXlf UQbeHwzH8RL8bf+tgVqNLcDO3Lw3OpW2F4vzeHfrx9OgW5QvPZ88QmXbbGoJGD2ukTLJ lP3DRF8mW9X2QTXHUhW1O6wUB3GRWaKkVx943TNygbzjj7kdC+o1s78RvVKrSCQD6jNz 01kg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0jMx9FyBkPrKVx7/K3hntEAH7a0/Fb46HwZljAVxR/GjBgwiK KGIy4X1/4Jo5jvkM3p3SGh4C8w== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e20b:: with SMTP id q11mr5549867pgh.263.1555700740202; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:6:12:9c46:e0da:efbf:69cc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q24sm9246042pgm.16.2019.04.19.12.05.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:05:38 -0400 From: Joel Fernandes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Daniel Colascione , Jonathan Kowalski , Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel , Andy Lutomirski , Steven Rostedt , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Suren Baghdasaryan , Alexey Dobriyan , Al Viro , Andrei Vagin , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , Kees Cook , Linux FS Devel , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Michal Hocko , Nadav Amit , Serge Hallyn , Shuah Khan , Stephen Rothwell , Taehee Yoo , Tejun Heo , Thomas Gleixner , Android Kernel Team , Tycho Andersen Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Add polling support to pidfd Message-ID: <20190419190538.GC251571@google.com> References: <20190411175043.31207-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190416120430.GA15437@redhat.com> <20190416192051.GA184889@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:14:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:58 AM Daniel Colascione wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Kowalski wrote: > > > > > > Would using something other than POLLIN be an option (maybe POLLPRI)? > > > The convention is to use it to indicate readability on the descriptor, > > > and also possibly POLLHUP instead of POLLERR (the latter is less of a > > > problem, but FreeBSD also does the same, so it'd help with some > > > consistency for libraries wanting to use this, which aren't interested > > > in other sub states). > > > > Existing event loop libraries generally support checking only for > > readability and writability. Not setting POLLIN would make these FDs > > more difficult to use with existing event loop libraries. What > > advantage would compensate for this difficulty? > > Right. > > Usually you'd set POLLIN in _addition_ to any other more specialized poll flag. > > For example, when a socket has shut down the read side, we do > > if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) > mask |= EPOLLRDHUP | EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > > because while it's true that EPOLLRDHUP is the most _specific_ poll > bit, it's _also_ true that a read shutdown means that the read() will > return immediately. > > So generally a HUP condition should mean that POLLIN and POLLOUT also > get set. Not because there's any actual _data_ to be read, but simply > because the read will not block. Sounds great and I agree with Linus and Daniel. So I am guessing you are Ok with the current set of flags proposed this patch, so I will keep them intact in future patch postings. But please let me know if you want me to change something about the flags. thanks! - Joel