Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/skbuff: don't waste memory reserves
To:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190418180524.23489-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
 <791f4f23-d931-4ac8-4e60-3ffe46c4ece2@gmail.com>
 <c2c270d9-29c0-b993-84c5-4c994608f7c8@virtuozzo.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <299e5bb3-665b-2d3c-fa4c-75466c4a51bf@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:36:58 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c2c270d9-29c0-b993-84c5-4c994608f7c8@virtuozzo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 04/19/2019 06:17 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/18/19 9:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:

>> Are you targeting net or net-next tree ?
>>
> 
> I think it's up to Dave to decide where the patches should go. They apply cleanly on both trees.
> The last two patches just minor cleanups so they are definitely net-next material.
> 

Not at all, please carefully read 

Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst

Q: How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be in?

You need to split your patches in two series, not assume that David will manually do
the manual work for you.

Thank you